Thursday, September 29, 2011

The Origins of Circumcision

Alice C. Linsley


Circumcision originated in what is today the Sudan region of the Upper Nile before 3200 BC. Both males and females of the ruling class were circumcised. It is not known whether the common people were circumcised, probably not. This appears to have been a practice of the ruler-priest caste called "Horim" or Horites, after 580 BC known as Jews, though some Arabs were also in this caste.
3200 BC flint knife
from al-Badari

Flint or obsidian knives were used to perform the circumcisions. These often had edges sharper than modern surgical steel. Flint workshops have been found throughout the Negev, suggesting that even after the production of iron tools, the flint knife was prefered for circumcision, possibly because infection was less of a risk given the high saline composition of the flint.

The largest flint knives, dating to about 3200 B.C., were found at Hierakonpolis, a center for the worship of Horus, who was called the "son of God." Votive offerings at the temple of Horus were gigantic, up to ten times larger than the normal maceheads and stone bowls found elsewhere. These objects are found only at Nekhen (Hierakonpolis), suggesting that the 4000 B.C. temple there was extremely prestigious.

Today circumcision of boys is widely practiced among Jews, and circumcision of boys and girls is practiced among many Nilotic peoples such as the Samburu. The circumcision of Samburu boys is a rite of initiation to moran (warrior) status.  This is reflected in Joshua 5:4 which says, "And this is the reason why Joshua circumcised them: all the males of the people who came out of Egypt, all the men of war."

For Samburu girls circumcision of the clitoris signifies availablity for marriage and childbearing. Until she is circumcised, she is regarded as unfit for marriage.  Here are some first-hand conversations that express the respect felt for circumcised wives in the part of Africa where this practice originated.

A Somali man said: “You had better treat your mother with more respect, boy! A circumcised woman! A woman whose womb has brought forth three sons into this family! That is a circumcised woman, my son, not some loose woman who can be treated as of little account. Without her, this family would have no one to pass along the name! Now you listen: you start giving her gifts, you cast your eyes down when she enters a room; do you hear me?”

A Sudanese man said: “Is this how you speak to your sister-in-law? Have you forgotten that she is circumcised? If this is how you treat circumcised women, then does your own family mean nothing to you?"


Biblical References to Circumcision

There are three references to circumcision in the Bible that tell us about this practice.  The first concerns Moses' cousin wife, Zipporah. Then Zipporah took a flint and cut off her son's foreskin, and touched his legs with it. She said, "You are truly a bridegroom of blood to me!"  And when He let him alone, she added, "A bridegroom of blood because of the circumcision."  Exodus 4:25, 26

This is believed to be the oldest biblical reference to circumcision and it pertains to the ruler's cousin wife. Moses' first wife was his half-sister, a Kushite (Numbers 12). Her designation as Kushite means that Moses' father married a Kushite. Likely this refers to Ishar, the mother of Korah and Moses' half-sister wife.  She was a descendent of Seir the Horite (Gen. 36).  So this oldest reference to circumcision connects it to the Horim or Horites.

The next reference concerns God's command to Abraham to circumcise all the males of his household (Gen. 17:10-14). This account shows evidence of the covenantal theology of a later period. Probably the source is the same as the book of Deuteronomy.

Finally, there is the somewhat ambiguous account of the renewal of the covenant whereby Joshua was to circumcise the "people" a second time.  At that time the Lord said to Joshua, "Make flint knives and circumcise the people of Israel again the second time." So Joshua made flint knives, and circumcised the people of Israel at Gibeath ha-aralot. (Joshua 5:2,3)

Some translations read "children" instead of people and some read "Israelites," allowing for the possibility that females were circumcised also.  It is argued that "ha-aralot" can refer only to male circumcision since it means "hill of foreskins," but in Pharaonic circumcision, the clitorus was regarded as foreskin.

The Bible offers this explanation for the second circumcision: Though all the people who came out had been circumcised, yet all the people that were born on the way in the wilderness after they had come out of Egypt had not been circumcised. (Joshua 5:5) 

In November 1982, Canadian Anthropologist Janice Boddy's fascinating essay on Pharaonic circumcision appeared in American Ethnologist. The essay was titled "Womb as Oasis: The symbolic context of Pharaonic circumcision in rural Northern Sudan" (Vol.9, pgs. 682-698). Here Boddy sets forth her research on Pharaonic circumcision among the Sudanese. Among the Sudanese this practice of female circumcision parallels the circumcision of males and reflects the binary distinction between females and males, one of the more important binary distinctions found throughout the Bible.

Boddy explains: "In this society women do not achieve social recognition by becoming like men, but by becoming less like men physically, sexually, and socially. Male as well as female circumcision rites stress this complementarity. Through their own operation, performed at roughly the same age as when girls are circumcised (between five and ten years), boys become less like women: while the female reproductive organs are covered, that of the male is uncovered. Circumcision, then, accomplishes the social definition of a child's sex by removing physical characteristics deemed appropriate to his or her opposite: the clitoris and other external genitalia, in the case of females, the prepuce of the penis, in the case of males." (Boddy, pg. 688)


Found at Tel Gezer (dated 12th to mid-11th century BC)
The Egyptian word for phallus was khenen (hnn) related to khenty, meaning before or in front of

Herodotus (BC 485-425) wrote concerning the origins of circumcision:

"Egyptians and the Ethiopians have practiced circumcision since time immemorial. The Phoenicians and the Syrians of Palestine themselves admit that they learnt the practice from the Egyptians, while the Syrians in the river Thermodon and the Pathenoise region and their neighbours the Macrons say they learnt it recently from the Colchidians. These are the only races which practice circumcision, and it is observable that they do it in the same way with the Egyptians."


Related reading:  Circumcision Among Abraham's People; Circumcised Phallus an Egyptian Hieroglyph; Circumcision and Binary Distinctions

Monday, September 26, 2011

God Made Cats

Alice C. Linsley



Were you to ask my friends about me, only a few would know about Just Genesis and my work in biblical anthropology. More would know that I enjoy gardening and renovating houses.  I'm working on my fourth house at the moment.

A few more would tell you about the young people I help to develop their writing skills and find publishers for their work. You may read some of their work here and here.

Only my closest friends know that I rehabilitate disturbed cats. These are often abandoned pets that have been severely abused to the point that they cannot be adopted until they learn to trust humans and exhibit normal feline behaviors. My three helpers in this effort are cats: Maximilian (8 years), Widget (6 years) and Bibb (2 years).

All of the cats I've worked with have been successfully adopted.  Some were easy to rehab and others were very challenging.  The easiest was an orange tabby named George.  The most difficult was a very large and very aggressive gray female who could not be brought into contact with my cats because she would have injured them.  She had been named "Emerson" for Ralph Waldo.  I'm sure that contributed to her problem!  The first step in her rehabilitation was to rename her "Eme" and keep her in solitary confinement with lots of toys, food, water, soft pillow beds and climbing trees for five weeks.  During that time I visited her four times a day for fifteen minutes.  Finally she allowed me to stroke her and eventually she climbed on my lap.  After five weeks and a five-page typed report on her adjustment and needs, Eme went to the Woodford County Humane Society which found her the perfect home.

I am fond of dogs and horses also, but cats just seem to find their way to my house.  I have the local animal rescue on speed dial because I simply can't take on every case.  Sometimes the same cats that the rescue lady takes away make their way back to me via the humane society since I'm on the list as a foster home for cats waiting to be adopted.

When God created this world, He thought to make cats.  I'm not sure why, but if you are fond of these creatures you know what a wonderful invention they are!  Cats are playful, independent, affectionate, proud, often protective and territorial, and the perfect defense against rodents. They have been the subject of great poetry, my favorite being Dorothy Sayers' "The Final Redemption of Cats."

The ancient Egyptians had a special affection for cats, to the point that they even mummified them. In 1888 an Egyptian farmer discovered a large tomb with 80,000 mummified cats outside the town of Beni Hasan, dating to 1000-2000 BCE.

Just for fun, here are some images of cats:


Is it feeding time yet?





Inbread cat


Bronze cat from ancient Egypt

Sunday, September 25, 2011

The Nine Divine Utterances

Alice C. Linsley


In Genesis 1 the words “And God said” appear nine times, reflecting the base nine counting system of Abraham and his Kushite ancestors. The rabbis divert attention from this by insisting that there are ten divine utterances, as is taught in Mishna Avot 5:2. The Mishna is the first major work of Rabbinic Judaism, dating to 200 AD.  It addresses matters of religious ceremony after the destruction of the Temple and is anti-Christian in tone. It also reveals a departure from the Horite expectation of the Divine Son and the creation of a new ethnic narrative.

According to rabbinic oral tradition God created the world with ten utterances. The Mishnah states that if God had created the world by a single utterance, men would distain the world and would not uphold God's order. (Mishnah Avot 5:1)

Following this teaching, at least ten verses of Torah should be read in the synagogue. These represent the ten divine utterances. The objection that the words "And God said" appear only nine times in Genesis 1, is dismissed in the Gemara which insists that the words “In the beginning” count as a divine utterance. This idea is also found in the Babylonian Talmud (Megillah 21).

The base nine counting system of the Horites explains much of the number symbolism of the Bible. The genealogical segments have a depth of ten. One theory is that this facilitates the tribal story teller's remembrance of the segment. However, it is more likely that the segment is remembered to a depth of nine and that the tenth ruler represents the beginning of a new segment.  Keeping this structure in mind, we discover some interesting patterns.

Ruth and Boaz, both descendants of Terah, begin a new segment which traces the Son of God through David. This is significant since David’s city was Bethlehem and I Chronicles 4:4 lists Hur (Hor) as the "father of Bethlehem". The author of I Chronicles knew that Bethlehem was originally a Horite settlement. The Horites were ruler-priests whose lines intermarried exclusively in expection that a woman of their people would bring forth "the Seed" of Genesis 3:15.

The Seed has the power of generation. John 1:1-4 explains that He is the generative Word who was with God in the beginning, and who was God. "Through Him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In Him was life, and that life was the light of men."


Jesus' Ascent is Patterned by Horite Marriage and Ascendency Custom

The pattern for understanding Christ's rule is evident in Scripture, in the marriage and ascendency pattern of his Horite ancestors.  The Horite ruler and his two wives comprised one territory, one kingdom. Likewise, Christ has brides according to that pattern.  The first is represented by those of the Old Covenant who were faithful in their expectation of the Divine Son's appearing.  These were Jesus' kin, His sister bride, so to speak.  The second wife is represented by those who believe that Jesus is the Son of God according to the Scriptures. To express this another way: the Good Shepherd has two flocks grazing in different pastures, but both belong to Him. As He has said, "Other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one Shepherd." (John 10:16)

The Church is one flock and the other flock are those who died in expectation of Messiah's appearing. The last of that generation were Simeon, Anna and John the Baptist. They are the three witnesses to the Kingdom's appearing. The ruler-priest Simeon represents the Blood, the prophetess Anna represents the Spirit, and John the Forerunner represents the Water. These are the three witnesses to which John alludes when he tells us, "This is He who came by water and blood - Jesus Christ; not only by water, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who bears witness, because the Spirit is truth. For there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness on earth: the Spirit, the water and the blood; and these three agree as one." (1 John 5:6-8)

The sister Bride is always the second wife, and it is after this that the heir-apparent begins to rule.  So the age of the Church is predicted in the Old Testament.

The Horites were the earliest caste of priests from whom the Aaronic, Levitical and Zadokite priesthoods emerged later in Israel’s history. Tzadok צדוק, meaning "righteous" was a descendant of Aaron.  He was the first High Priest to serve in the New Temple built by Solomon. Ezekiel extols the sons of Zadok as staunch opponents of paganism and indicates their right to unique duties and privileges in the future Third Temple (Ezekiel 42:13, 43:19). This is one of numerous references to the number nine and its factor of three in the Bible.  Ezekiel is called “son of man” (literally ben’adam) 93 times, and Ezekiel 4:5 speaks of how the prophet is to endure punishment for 390 days.

The older mystical number system was base nine and spoke of the coming of the Seed. The number one represents God and one begets two in a binary system.  The ancient numerology points to the incarnation of the Logos of God (2) who by the Spirit (3) became incarnate and was born of the Virgin Mary (5), lived as a man and died (6), rose from the dead, showing great mercy to all the world (4) and ascended as the Son of God (7) and the Royal Bridegroom (8) who enters the bridal chamber to consummate the marriage to his pure and spotless Bride (9) with whom He will rule over an eternal kingdom delivered to the Son by the Father (10). Note that the consummation is represented by the number 9 and 10 symbolizes the beginning of a new heaven and earth.

In Genesis 1 there are nine divine utterances concerning this world, but this world is passing away and the new is coming.


Related reading:  The Afro-Arabian Number System; Forty Days and Forty Nights; Yes, Georgia, There is a Kingdom; The Kingdom of God in Genesis

Friday, September 23, 2011

Chronology of the Genesis Rulers

Alice C. Linsley



The following are approximate dates which have been calculated using the genealogical data of Genesis. 

B.C. 2490-2415 – Noah, lived when the Sahara experienced a wet period (Karl W. Butzer 1966)


B.C. 2438-2363 – Ham, son of Noah by his cousin-wife


B.C. 2417-2342 – Kush/Cush, son of Ham by his half-sister (?) and the father of Nimrod and Raamah


B.C. 2290-2215 - Nimrod , known in history as “Sargon the Great”


B.C. 2238-2163 - Arpacshad, son by Asshur's daughter, probably his cousin-wife. ("Shad" means happy.)


B.C. 2217-2042 - Salah, likely Arpacshad's son by his sister-wife.


B.C. 2196-2121 - Eber, likely Salah's son by his sister-wife.        


B.C. 2175-2100 - Peleg, likely Eber's son by his sister-wife. Peleg's brother was Joktan the Elder.


B.C. 2154-2079 - Reu , likely the head of Leah's line, who named her first-born son Reu-ben.


B.C. 2133-2058 - Serug, likely Reu's firstborn by his sister-wife.

B.C. 2112-2037 - Nahor, likely Serug's firstborn by his sister-wife.


B.C. 2091-2016 - Terah, likely Nahor's firstborn by his sister-wife.


B.C. 2039-1964 - Abraham, Terah's son by his cousin-wife.


B.C. 1987-1912 - Joktan, Abraham's firstborn son by his cousin bride, Keturah.




Standard Chronology of Egypt and Sudroid Asia


3200 - 3050 BC: Naqada III; the last century of the Predynastic period of Egypt. Time of transition during which the Upper and Lower Nile regions became culturally and politically unified. This is one of the places in Africa where flint knives have been found for ceremonial use in sacrifice and probably circumcision.

Menes is credited with first uniting the Upper and Lower Nile peoples into one Kingdom. Numerous later Egyptian writings claim Narmer as the conqueror of all the societies along the length of the Nile River. He wore the double crown to show that he was sovereign over both. The serekh surrounding Narmer’s name is surmounted by Horus’s totem, the falcon. Horus was regarded as a deity and called “son of God” at Nekhen in Sudan as early as 4000 B.C. During the 1897/1898 field season, British archaeologist J. E. Quibell found what is called the “Narmer Palette” at Nekhen (Hierakonpolis), The Narmer Palette illustrates Narmer’s unification of the Nilotic peoples.


2900 BC – 2334 BC: Mesopotamian wars of the Early Dynastic period.

2775 BC – 2650 BC: Second Dynasty wars in Egypt.

2700 BC: Early Dynastic (Archaic) period ended in Ancient Egypt (according to French Egyptologist Nicolas Grimol). This period includes 1st -2nd Dynasties.

c. 2700 BC: Old Kingdom started in Ancient Egypt. 3rd–6th Dynasties.

c. 2686 BC: Early Dynastic (Archaic) period ends in Ancient Egypt (other date is 2700 BC).

c. 2686 BC: Old Kingdom starts in Ancient Egypt (other date is 2700 BC).

 2686 BC: Egypt: End of Second Dynasty, start of Third Dynasty. Pharaoh Khasekhemwy died. Pharaoh Sanakhte started to reign.

c. 2685 BC: Bull lyre, from the tomb of Queen Puabi, Ur (modern Muqaiyir, Iraq) was made. It is now in University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

c. 2681 BC – c. 2662 BC: Reign of Djoser, Pharaoh of Egypt, Third Dynasty.

2668 BC: Pharaoh Sanakhte died.

c. 2667 BC: Pharaoh Djoser started to rule (other date is 2681 BC).

2660 BC: Archaic period ended in Ancient Egypt.

c. 2660 BC: Old Kingdom in Ancient Egypt started (Another date is 2715 BC).

c. 2648 BC: Pharaoh Djoser died (another date is 2662 BC).

2630 BC – 2611 BC: Imhotep, Vizier of Egypt, constructed the Pyramid of Djoser

2613 BC: End of 3rd Dynasty, start of 4th Dynasty. Pharaoh Huni died. Pharaoh Sneferu started to reign.

c. 2613 BC – 2494 BC: 4th Dynasty; The Great Sphinx at Giza was built

c. 2601 BC – c. 2515 BC: 4th Dynasty; Great Pyramids at Giza built for Menkaure, Khafre and Khufu.

c. 2601 BC: Khufu started to rule in Ancient Egypt.

2600 BC: The cities of Harappa (Har-appa mean “Hor is father”) and Mohenjo-daro, along with 4 other major shrine cities, became centers of a vast Afro-Asiatic civilization that included over 2,500 cities and settlements across the whole of Pakistan, much of India, and parts of Afghanistan and Iran, covering a region of around one million square miles.

2600 BC: End of the Early Dynastic II Period and the beginning of the Early Dynastic IIIa Period in Mesopotamia.



Alignment of Egypt Chronology with Genesis (following Breasted’s timeline*)


First Intermediate Period 
2475-2445 BC: 7th - 8th Dynasties       Noah, Shem, Ham and Japheth

2445–2160 BC: 9th -10th Dynasties      Arpachshad, Salah, Eber and Peleg and Joktan



Middle Kingdom 
2160-2000 BC: 11th Dynasty                Nahor, Terah and Abraham

2000-1788 BC: 12th Dynasty                Jacob, Esau, Joseph


*James Henry Breasted (1865 – 1935) was an American archaeologist and historian. After completing his PhD at the University of Berlin in 1894, he joined the faculty of the University of Chicago. In 1901 he became director of the Haskell Oriental Museum at the University of Chicago, where he continued to concentrate on Egypt. In 1919 he became the founder of the Oriental Institute at the University, designed to be a lab for research into the rise of civilization in the Near East. In 1905 Breasted was promoted to professor in the first chair in Egyptology and Oriental History in the United States.



Related reading: Thoughts on Calculating the Dates of the Patriarchs

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Horite Deified Sons

Alice C. Linsley



At the Temple at Dendur  in Nubia two deified sons of a local Nubian chieftain, Pedisi and Pihor are honored. They were the sons of a Medjay ruler. The ancient Egyptians called them "Medjayu." Today they are called Bedja or Beja. They brought gold to Egypt from mines deep in the heartland of Nubia and Kush.

The Bedja are metalworking nomads from the eastern Nubian desert. They were recognized for their military skills and served in the Egyptian army. They policed the desert in the late Old Kingdom. At the end of Egypt's Second Intermediate Period (ca. 1640–1550 B.C.) they played a role in expelling the Hyksos from the Nile Delta. The Medjayu buried their dead in a distinctive way in circular "pan graves" which they marked with the decorated skulls of bulls, gazelles and goats. These have been found in cemeteries of Upper Egypt and Lower Nubia beginning in the Second Intermediate Period. (Source: Sudan 2000–1000 B.C., Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. The Metropolitan Museum of Art)

The Beja (Arabic: البجا‎) are Kushitic people who live in parts of Sudan, Egypt and the Horn of Africa. Their name comes from the ancient Egyptian word for meteroric iron - bja (metal from heaven), and they were metalworkers.

Beja corresponds to the Sanskrit word bija, meaning semen or seed. Meteoritic iron was used in the fabrication of iron beads in Nubia as early as 6000 years ago. These beads may have been perceived as seeds from heaven which brought divine power to the wearer. Meteoritic iron was used in the fabrication of crooks and flails, the symbols of the Egyptian and Kushite pharaohs. These symbols were believed to give the ruler powers from heaven.

Pedisi and Pihor were the deified sons of a Horite ruler-priest.  They held an important place in the Horite temple at Dendur where they are shown with Isis. Ped-Isi means "gift of Isis."  A similar name, Ped-Ashtar, was found at the oldest tomb in Bahariya. Ped-Ashtar was a Horite priest and the grandfather of Zed-Khonsu-efank, the governor of Bahariya.  His wife, Ta-Nefert-Bastet, was the daughter of Ped-Isi, who was called a prophet (pshai).

Pihor was probably Pedisi's half-brother or twin.  His name means "belonging to Hor."  The Horites called Hor the "son of God" as he was conceived of a virgin queen who was overshadowed by the Sun, the emblem of the Creator Re. Hor's mother was called Hathor-Meri (later Isis) and her animal totem was a cow.  She is shown holding her newborn son in a manger or stable. The stable was constructed by the Horite priest Har-si-Atef.  Atef was the crown worn by deified rulers. The Arabic word atef or atif means "kind."  So the Horite ruler who wore the atef crown was to embody kindness.

Ped-Isis and Pi-Hor were the sons of a metalworking ruler of Ku-pr. Kuper means "temple of Kush." The ancient Egyptian word for temple or house was pr.  The Hapiru devotees of Horus called a temple O-piru, meaning "house of the Sun." Azu or Asa is an East African name for God. So Azu-piranu means “house of God” and is equivalent to the Hebrew word "Beth-el."  Horite ruler-priests were called Hapiru in Akkadian Cuneiform and Habiru in the Kushitic languages. The Egyptians called the temple attendants ˁprw, the w being the plural suffix.

Clearly belief in a deified son who would embody kindness and unite the peoples found fulfillment in Jesus Christ, a descendant of the Horite ruler-priests, the divine son of the Virgin Mary, daughter of the priest Joachim of the line of Nathan.  Jesus Christ is the fulfillment of the promise made to Abraham's Horite ancestors in Eden (Gen. 3:15).


Related reading:  Kushite Kings and the Kingdom of GodNilotic-Kushitic Celestial Archetypes; Resurrection as Mirrored RealityAbraham's Mother and Seth's Father; Who Were the Horites?Who Were the Kushites?; Petra Reflects Horite Beliefs; Reality is Cross Shaped


Monday, September 19, 2011

Abraham's Mother and Seth's Father

Alice C. Linsley

A reader of Just Genesis named Andrew has asked two interesting questions. The first is about the identity of Abraham's mother.


Abraham's Horite Mother

The Babylonian Talmud names Abraham's maternal grandfather as Karnevo, an Akkadian form of Karnak. Karnak was a Horite temple along the Nile. The women in Genesis are Horite and the Horite ancestry of the Jews is acknowledged in their practice of calling their parents and ancestors "horim."

Abraham and his horim married exclusively within their Horite caste. This is a characteristic of caste. It is called endogamy. The Horites were closely associated with the rulers of Kush, Nubia and Egypt. Joseph married Asenath, the daughter of the priest of Onn (Heliopolis) on the Nile. Moses married Zipporah, the daughter of Jethro, the priest of Midian.

Since blood line and ethnicity were traced through the mothers, as with Jews today, it is surprising that the Bible does not tell us about Abraham's mother. Perhaps this is because the final editors of Genesis were rabbis for whom this was problematic because it means that Abraham was not the first Jew.  He was a Horite.

Andrew's second question deals with Seth's family. "Your statements that Adam and Eve lived millions of years ago as the first humans rings true to me, but Scripture wise where do you get that Enoch was Seth and Cain's father? Genesis 5:3 clearly states the Adam was Seth's father, or am I missing something?"


Who was Seth's father?

Genesis 5:3 indicates that Seth, as well as Kain, was a "son" and son can mean offspring or descendant. Here the author is connecting Seth to Adam to emphasize that Seth was made in the likeness of Adam who was made in the likeness of God.  There may be a suggestion here that Kain was not in the divine image, but the context is still about deified sons who were rulers.

The rulers listed in Genesis 4 (Cain's line) and 5 (Seth's line) lived about 4000-3000 BC, no earlier. The two ruler lines intermarried, as can be determined by scientific analysis of the kinship and ascendency pattern revealed in the geneaological segment shown below. The ruler who heads this segment was called Enoch/Enosh/Nok. If Adam and Eve were Kain's and Seth's parents they would have been contemporaries of Enoch. The Bible doesn't permit this interpretation. Adam and Eve stand for the first humans created by God. In this sense they are meta-historical.



Kain and Set (Set or Seti) were probably the firstborn sons of Enoch's brother by two different wives. It was the custom of these rulers to have two wives. One was a half-sister, as was Sarah to Abraham.  The other was a cousin or niece, as was Keturah to Abraham. Two wives meant there were two firstborn sons.  These sons ascended to different thrones. The firstborn son of the sister wife (probably Kain) was the heir of his biological father. The firstborn son of the cousin/niece wife (probably Set) was the heir of his maternal grandfather, after whom he was named. This is why the name of a ruler is often found two generations later in the line of the ruler's fraternal confederates. Esau the Elder had a grandson by this daughter who was Esau the Younger.  This is true for Joktan, Sheba and Lamech, as shown in the diagram below.





They married their cousins and the cousin brides named their firstborn sons after their fathers. This is why Seth's firstborn son and Kain's firstborn son have essentially the same name - Enoch/Enoch/Nok. The root of that name was NK. Later we find that the lines of Ham and Shem intermarried also.

The marriage and ascendency pattern of Abraham's ancestors is the same as that of Abraham and Moses. All of these people were Horites who believed that "the Woman" would be a virgin of their own people and she would bring forth "the Seed/Grain" of Genesis 3:15. Jesus refered to this when He told his disciples that He was going to Jerusalem to die. They refused to accept this, so He explained that unless a seed/grain falls into the earth, it cannot live.


Related reading:  The Marriage and Ascendency Pattern of the Horite Rulers; Terah's Nubian Ancestors


Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Ronald Hendel: 10 Methods


A recently published book of essays edited by Ronald Hendel puts forward, in the voices of ten different Biblical scholars, new and enlightening ways to read and understand some of the most well-known stories in the Book of Genesis. Reviewed by Kent Harold Richards, this latest compendium of Biblical scholarship furthers our understanding of Genesis Bible study and demonstrates through each essay how to study the Bible effectively. Richards warns, however, that this book is not for the beginner. While he credits Ronald Hendel with concisely but thoroughly providing proper context for the essays, Richards warns that Ronald Hendel’s new book is predicated upon an understanding of Genesis Bible study, including both basic knowledge of the text and familiarity with traditional critical approaches.

Several of the topics addressed in this volume on Genesis Bible study include culture memory perspectives as demonstrated by focusing on slightly different dimensions of the Jacob story, reflections on gender and sexuality in Genesis, specifically as they pertain to the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, as well as the issues surrounding various Biblical translations. One of the essays in Ronald Hendel’s book emphasizes that the awareness of contemporary and now-obscure literary sources–and their redaction–is important in order to achieve a fuller understanding of the first few chapters of Genesis, and thus Genesis Bible study. Such an approach is lauded by Richards, who then goes on to support another essay’s premise that a useful tool in how to study the Bible effectively is not to apologetically smooth over questions that arise from readings of Biblical texts, but rather to approach the texts critically.

Richards’s review of this new book by Ronald Hendel makes a strong case for continually striving for fresh and new perspectives in the approach to Genesis Bible study. Richards’s endorsement of Reading Genesis: Ten Methods edited by Ronald Hendel–and reflecting the scholarship of ten dynamic voices in the field–is a strong case for adding both the book and the critical methods it advocates to the practice of Genesis Bible study.

Read it all here with the full text of Kent Harold Richards' review of Hendel's book.
 

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Twins in Genesis


Alice C. Linsley


Genesis 25:226: The children struggled together within her. She said, “If it be so, why do I live?” She went to inquire of Yahweh.

Yahweh said to her, “Two nations are in your womb. Two peoples will be separated from your body. The one people will be stronger than the other people. The elder will serve the younger.”

When her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.

The first came out red all over, like a hairy garment. They named him Esau.

After that, his brother came out, and his hand had hold on Esau’s heel. He was named Jacob. Isaac was sixty years old when she bore them.


Reflecting on this passage, a Nigerian reader called "Yemi Tom" has this to say: “That Esau and Jacob were twins is very easy for me to accept as fact partly because of my Yoruba (Jerubaal? Judges 6:32) ancestry. Yorubas have the highest twinning rates in the world and the second child (named Kehinde) to be delivered is always regarded as the senior while the first (named Taiye or Taiwo) is regarded as second in seniority. Twins and multiple births in general have long been revered by the Yorubas as recorded in the Ifa literary corpus. Ifa literature says a lot about the first becoming last and vice versa.”

Ymei Tom’s explanation about twins and Yoruba custom is very interesting and helpful. Here again we find evidence for an African context behind the Genesis material. I personally don't take issue with the idea that Jacob and Esau were the twin sons of Isaac. That is what the text indicates. That said, it is important to investigate other the possible explanations.


Possibility One:  Heteropaternal superfecundation

The Hebrew word for twins is תְאוֹמִים, te-o-mim. There are two sets of twins in the Bible, both mentioned in Genesis. They are Jacob and Esau (born to Rebecca) and Perez and Zerah (born to Tamar of Timna).  Both Rebecca and Tamar were the daughters of rulers and they grew up around the Horite shrines maintained by the fathers. Their similar status and environment is suggestive of certain practices which were later condemned by the prophets. Rebecca's father's title was Bethuel, which is related to the Hebrew Bethulah, which means a virgin. Tamar's father ruled over a territory in Timna which was a prosperous metal working region dedicated to Hathor, the virgin mother of Hor who was called "son of God."

Tamar means date nut palm and was a symbol of fertility. Honoring this ancestor, Solomon made her hometown in Edom one of his seven fortified cities. Tamar is to Edom what Anath is to Egypt. Both were daughters of ruler-priests and the younger of their sons received seniority. In the case of Perez and Zerah we again find the reversal of seniority that YT mentions as a feature of Yoruba twin lore.

Rebecca's twin sons may be a case of heteropaternal superfecundation, that is half-brothers in the womb. This would mean that Rebecca was impregnated by two different men and would explain the extreme differences in the boys' appearances and temperaments.

There are half a dozen cases of heteropaternal superfecundation in the medical literature, many of which involve twins of different colors. The first case was documented by the American physician John Archer in 1810 and appears in the 1980 edition of the medical textbook Williams Obstetrics. In Archer's report a white woman had relationships with a black man and a white man only a few days apart.  Another similar case from 1982 appears in the most recent edition of Williams Obstetrics. In 1978, Paul Terasaki of the UCLA School of Medicine reported in the New England Journal of Medicine that he and his colleagues had conclusively established a case of superfecundation using a procedure called tissue or HLA (human leukocyte antigen) testing.

IVF conceived fraternal twin half-brothers born to Dutch couple in 1993

Possibility Two:  Intentional Ambiguity

It is possible that the author of Genesis didn't know whether Jacob and Esau were twins or firstborn sons of two different wives. He may be hedging when he speaks of "twins" and "two nations." It is certainly possible that Jacob and Esau were twin sons of Isaac, but the part about "two nations" suggests other possibilities.


Possibility Three:  Twins as a Celestial Pattern

Twins are often half-brothers in ancient literature and mythology.  This being the case, Jacob and Esau might be the firstborn sons of two wives but cast as twins after the celestial twins Castor and Pollux. In the case of these twin stars, we also find that one is weaker than the other. This is true also with the twin stars Sirius A and B.


Possibility Four:  Firstborn Sons by Two Wives

It is likely that Jacob and Esau were Isaac's firstborn sons by two different wives.  It was the custom of the Horite rulers to have two wives living in separate households on a north-south axis. This was the case with the rulers listed in Genesis 4 and 5 and with Abraham's grandfather and father, even Abraham himself. Sarah resided in Hebron and Keturah to the south in Beersheba. Sarah was Abraham's half-sister and the bride of his youth. Keturah was Abraham's cousin or niece bride and the wife of his later years.

The firstborn sons of the two wives ruled over different peoples.  The firstborn son of the half-sister wife ruled over the territory of his biological father.  So Isaac ruled over Abraham's territory between Hebron and Beersheba.  The firstborn son of the cousin/niece wife ruled over the territory of his maternal grandfather, after whom he was named.  So Lamech the Younger, Methuselah's firstborn son by his cousin wife Naamah, ruled after Lamech the Elder. 




This same pattern is evident with Abraham's cousin/niece wife Keturah who bore Abraham six sons.  The firstborn was Joktan, named after Keturah's father. The Joktanite clans still live in the region of southern Arabia.



Analysis of the marriage and ascendency pattern of Abraham's Horite caste reveals that only the cousin/niece bride named her firstborn son after her father.  This cousin bride's naming prerogative makes it possible to trace Jesus' ancestry back to Genesis 4 and 5.

The diagram below presents the genealogical data for Seir the Horite and his contemporary Esau (Issa) the Elder. This information is found in Genesis 36.



Esau the Younger was Jacob's brother, either a twin or a half-brother. Ths diagram supports the view that he was a half-brother, named by Issac's cousin/niece wife after her father, Esau the Elder. Since Rebecca was Isaac's cousin wife, we assume that Esau was her firstborn son as indicated in the text. Her father is called "Bethuel," probably a priestly title.  Maybe his name was Esau. This would connect the Aramean Horites to the Edomite Horites.

Genesis 25:26 tells us that Isaac was sixty years old when Rebecca gave birth. This is consistent with the Horite marriage pattern where heir apparent take the cousin wife later in life. It also suggests that Issac had another wife, the wife of his youth. She would have been his half-sister and resided in the region of the Negev. This would be in keeping with the pattern of Isaac's Horite forefathers. I see no reason why Isaac would have only one wife when the rulers of Genesis 4 and 5, Abraham, Terah, Nahor and even Amram (Moses' father) had two wives.  We must at least entertain the possibility that Jacob was the firstborn son of Issac's half-sister wife and Esau was the firstborn son of his cousin wife.  If this is true, they did indeed represent two distinct but related peoples.


Realated reading:  The Biblical Theme of Two SonsEdom and the HoritesIsaac's Sons; Sons Who Stayed Home

Saturday, September 10, 2011

Trace the Migration of Modern Man


A faithful reader of Just Genesis is taking a course on China at Harvard.  Here is the link the professor uses to explain the "peopling of the world." It is very well done and sound factually, though a little out of date.  I hope the resource will be updated.  http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/journey/

Note that the point of Man's origin is Africa. This is also the point of origin of the Edenic Promise (Gen. 3:15) and the point of origin of Abraham's ancestors.

The rulers listed in Genesis 4 and 5 pertain to the late Holocene so when we meet Kain and his brother Seth, we are at the end of the video.


Thursday, September 8, 2011

"Wading Across" Reviews Just Genesis


This honest and balanced review of Just Genesis thrills me. I loved reading it. God bless you, owner of the blog Wading Across, who wrote on August 17:

I want to point you to a resource that I came across recently. Just Genesis, written by Alice C. Linsley. While I remain somewhat bemused and slightly skeptical of some of her conclusions, she is providing a viewpoint that, frankly, I find revolutionary – if not “problematic” – for “fundamentalist” types like me, and I actually enjoy it. She’s an anthropologist, and she’s also a strong, devout Christian from what I’ve read so far. She is putting traditional views of our early history from a Christian viewpoint on its ear. In one sense she’s destroying traditionally held beliefs, and in another sense she’s giving it stronger support and expanding it.

She is not a Young Earth Creationist, but she does not accept macro-evolution. She does believe the Flood occured, but that it was regional. She also believes that not only did Seth and Cain’s lines intermarry, but that Cain’s line survived the flood and that Shem and Ham’s lines intermarried. And on and on it goes. At the very least, she provides an interesting read that you’ll find yourself coming back to, giving you much to think about and talk about. Trust me, this is good coffee klatch discussion material! …Ahem (you know who you are)!

From here.

 
Related reading:  Reactions to my Genesis Research; An Interesting Conversation at Amazon.com; Alice C. Linsley's Research on Genesis
 
 
Prayer:  Father in Heaven, you look upon the heart and you know our yearnings.  Fulfill in us that which you purpose according to your will; that we might be conformed to the perfection of Jesus your Christ, and our works found pleasing to you on the last day.  Amen.
 
 

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Edom and the Horites

Alice C. Linsley



The Horites controlled a vast region from Southern Arabia to Syria. Petra reflects Horite belief and the rulers of Petra and the other Nabataean cities had Horus names.  Petra is in the red sandstone mountains of Edom, a territory in modern Jordan. According to Genesis 36, Edom was ruled by the Horite clans of Seir and Esau the Elder who married Adah. Esau the Elder was a contemporary of Seir the Horite. 

Esau the Younger married Oholibamah. It is possible that Esau the Younger was Jacob's half-brother, rather than his twin. Their father was Isaac, but they would have had different mothers, as Horite rulers had two wives.




The territory over which they ruled was rich in copper and within the Horite caste there were highly skilled metal workers.  The patroness of their mines and smelting operations was Hathor, the virgin mother of Hor who was called "son of God." The Horites were a caste of ruler-priests who were devoteed of Hor (Horus in Greek).

Edom  (BAR photo)





The Horite metal workers of Edom used the same techniques as the Horite metal workers who lived in the Timna Valley in the Wilderness of Paran. Esau the Elder's son Eliphaz married Seir's daughter who was named Timna.

The soil at Timna is also reddish-brown. Some scholars believe that there must have been a Timna in Edom as well in Paran, but it is more likely that the Horites controlled the metal working industries from Egypt to Jabal Harun (Aaron's Mountain) in Jordan. Timna is a Horite name.

Timna metal working shop
Edom is a variant of the Hausa odom which mean reddish-brown and the Hebrew adam which also means reddish-brown, the color of the soil from which God made the first man. The original context of the story of the creation of Adam is Nilotic. Adam is derived from the root DM which refers to blood (dam in Hebrew). This is a reference to the color of the soil from which Adam was made. Abraham's ancestors lived where red soil washed down from the Ethiopian Highlands. These soils have a cambic B horizon. Chromic Cambisols have a strong brown or red colour. The copper in the hills of Edom resembled the soil color of ancient Kush. The oldest known Horite temple at Nekhen, dating to 4000 B.C., is located in the part of the Sudan that was ancient Kush.

Esau is called "Edom" and the rabbis made much of how he sold his birthright for a pot of red stew, but this idea comes from a later period than Esau who lived approximately 1800 to 1730 B.C. (Middle Kingdom of Egypt).

According to Yoruba oral tradition, Esu was the third king of Ketu. The kingdom of Ketu is in the present-day Republic of Benin.  Abraham's cousin wife was Ketu-ra. The Jebusites (Ijebu) who controlled Jerusalem were divided into clans and one clan was called Ketu.



Earlier Coppersmiths

Abraham interacted with the Hivities and Hittite clans of Het who are listed in Genesis 10.  HT is the Hebrew and Arabic root for copper - nahas-het. Nahash means serpent. As an adjective it means shining bright, like burnished copper. So the clans of HeT were Bronze Age coppersmiths. The serpent image was sacred for them, just as it was for Moses and the people of Israel in the wilderness.

Genesis 23:3-20 tells us that the descendants of Heth were living in the land of Canaan where Abraham lived. He bought a burial site from them. They considered Abraham “a prince of God” among them (Gen. 23:6)

The Hittites spread into Anatolia and introduced iron work there. They didn’t call themselves “Hittites” (an anachronism) but Nes or Nus (Nuzi), and their language was called Nesli. They were Afro-Asiatic metal workers and the root of their original name is NS.


Related reading:  Tamar of Timnah; The Afro-Asiatic Metal WorkersPetra Reflects Horite Belief

Monday, September 5, 2011

Christians Debate Genesis and Evolution


Alice C. Linsley


The debate among Christians over Genesis and evolution involves several distinct but related issues. They are:

1. The Biblical assertion of a fixed order in creation
2. The Biblical view of a hierarchy in creation
3. The Genesis king lists as historical in contrast to the meta-historical Adam and Eve
4. Science's reliance on the Biblical assertion of uniformity in nature

First, there is the question of whether or not Genesis (and the Bible as a whole) allows for the possibility of evolutionary transformation from one species to another species. It does not. Genesis (and Jeremiah, Isaiah, Job) speak of a fixed binary order and hierarchy in creation, with humans at the pinnacle. The tiers of the hierarchy are spoken of as "kinds" and the clear implication is that there is a genetic boundary between kinds. That is why humans reproduce humans and bacteria - even when genetically modified - produces bacteria.

Consider the work of Richard Lenski at Michigan State University. He has grown E. coli in the test-tube for more than 40,000 generations. The first generations showed little mutation. Then a “mutator” strain arose, after which new genetic varieties were present in all cells, resulting in more than 250 varieties. The total number of single changes is more than a thousand, yet Lenski has produced nothing fundamentally new.

There is also the evidence that humans were fully human (and according to Genesis in the image and likeness of the Creator) from the beginning. Skeletal remains have been collected in Ethiopia, Kenya and Cameroon to recontruct a picture of the earliest known human populations. For example, Ward, Kimbel, Johanson, report here that the complete A afrarensis fourth metatarsal discovered at Hadar shows the deep, flat base and tarsal facets that "imply that its midfoot had no ape-like midtarsal break. These features show that the A. afarensis foot was functionally like that of modern humans."

"Australopithecus afarensis" means "Ape of the South found at the Afar Triangle."  The term was coined by South African anatomist Donald C. Johanson though Mary Leakey would have named her older find in Kenya "homo."  Today Johanson admits (as in the report above) that the evidence doesn't support his intial label of  "ape."

The earliest human skeletons show a range of anatomical features found among humans today.  Paleontologist Tim White reports here that the nearly complete skulls of people who lived 160,000 years ago are "like modern-day humans in almost every feature."

When Jeremy DeSilva, a British anthropologist, compared the ankle joint, the tibia and the talus of fossil hominins between 4.12 million to 1.53 million years old, he discovered that all of the hominin ankle joints resembled those of modern humans. Chimpanzees flex their ankles 45 degrees from normal resting position. This makes it possible for apes to climb trees with great ease. While walking, humans flex their ankles a maximum of 20 degrees. The human ankle is quite distinct from that of apes. Read more on this here.

Some of the A afarensis fossils dating between 700,000 and 2.4 million years are recognized as "early human fossils." These skeletal remains reveal human dentition, bipedalism, and oppositional thumbs. Stone tools for butchery of animals have also been found along with bones showing evidence of butchery. Dr. Curtis Marean of the Institute of Human Origins at Arizona State University said, "Most of the marks have features that indicate without doubt that they were inflicted by stone tools."

It seems that there is no evidence of macro-evolution from one kind to another kind. Even the evolutionary biologist Kenneth Roux admits this here. He has said, "Evolutionary convergence at the molecular level is presumed to be widespread, but is poorly documented." It is impossible to honestly document what has not been observed.

The claim of universality of the DNA code as a prediction of common descent doesn't align with known variations that violate this prediction. At the same time there appear to be specific fixed boundaries within the DNA code. What is often termed evolutionary "change" is really flux, a distinction many fail to make. Flux is expected within species. This is not the same as evolving from one species into another, and flux within a fixed order challenges the evolutionary convergence theory.

Certainly, there is evidence for fluctuation within kinds. Consider horses, dogs and the range of human populations. Yet each is easily identifiable.  Range of physical characteristics is not the same as change in essence. Take the case of water. The essence of water is always and only H2O, but the form of H2O can fluctuate between vapor, solid and liquid. We wouldn’t call this transformation “evolution.” People in the ancient world were familiar with the concept of “flux.” Plato and Aristotle address this in their writings. Plato’s Forms and Flux are very close to Afro-Asiatic thought of Genesis, as he studied in ancient Egypt.


Meta-historical Adam and Eve

There is also the question of Adam and Eve, who in biblical parlance represent the first created humans. As such we must relate them to the oldest known human populations in Africa, dating to over 3 million years. Yet their offspring Cain (Gen. 4) and his brother Seth (Gen. 5) have been identified as Chadic rulers who lived around 2800 BC. Cain and Seth, and the women that they married, represent a thriving river civilization with a lengthy list of rulers who established laws and maintained order. Obviously, there is a gap of time between the creation of the first humans and the emergence of a people to whom God made the Edenic promise that a woman of their people would bring forth the Divine Seed (Gen. 3:15). The whole of the Bible concerns God’s fulfillment of this first promise made concerning the "Woman" (not Eve, as she isn't named until five verses later). Therefore, this promise is also a prophecy concerning a future event which Christians call the "Incarnation of Jesus Christ." That is why I believe that Genesis is not ultimately about human origins. It is about the origins of Messianic expectation among Abraham's African ancestors.


Science's Reliance on the Fixed Order of Creation

Finally, there is the fact that science works because the world is exactly as Genesis asserts. The constellations, the stars and planets move according to a fixed pattern. That's why scientists can predict where to look and when to look there. That's how they can identify singularities, such as the Star of Bethlehem.

Progress in the sciences depends on the fixed order of creation. It assumes the consistency of the laws of nature. Geneticists recognize certain genetic patterns which form the basis for their research. Physicists' exploration of the material world is based on physical laws that do not change. Anthropologists find that humans are essentially the same regardless of their environments. The oldest known human skeletons show the same range of flux, the same essential nature as human skeletal structures today. Even technological "change" has been possible because of the fixed nature of mathematical and physical laws.


Saturday, September 3, 2011

7000 BC Horse Burial Linked to Sheba

Alice C. Linsley





"And God took a handful of South wind and from it formed a horse, saying: "I create thee, Oh Arabian. To thy forelock, I bind Victory in battle. On thy back, I set a rich spoil And a Treasure in thy loins. I establish thee as one of the Glories of the Earth... I give thee flight without wings." -- from an Ancient Bedouin Legend (Byford, et al. Origination of the Arabian Breed)


The tribe of Sheba is credited with the earliest domestication, breeding and export of horses. This has been confirmed by the discovery of a 9000-year-old horse burial in Asir Province of Saudi Arabia on the Yemen border. Yemen is the traditional homeland of the people of Sheba.

The people of Sheba were the descendants of the son of Raamah and their territory extended from the southwestern part of Arabia northward to Beersheba (the well of Sheba). Sheba was the brother of Dedan (Gen. 10:7). The region of Dedan is where the oldest Arabic texts have been found.

The people of Sheba and Dedan are connected to Abraham. Abraham's wife Keturah resided at Beersheba and her firstborn son was the father of Dedan the Younger (Gen. 25:3). Most Arabs are descended from Abraham through Joktan (Yaqtan). Josephus knew him as Joctan and his name is preserved in the ancient town of Jectan near Mecca.
Mud Residence at oasis in Asir Province
The Saudi Arabian Department of Museums and Antiquities recently reported the discovery of a 9,000-year-old horse burial at al-Maqar, along with a 3-foot-tall bust of a horse.

Ali al-Ghabban said that a Neolithic site at al-Maqar in Asir province has revealed the earliest evidence of horse domestication. “This discovery shows that horses were domesticated in the Arabian Peninsula for the first time more than 9,000 years ago,” said al-Ghabban. “Previous studies estimated the domestication of horses in Central Asia dating back 5,000 years.”
9000-year old horse burial in the region of ancient Sheba
In his book The Black Pharaohs, Robert Merkot reports that the people of Sheba were famous for breeding high quality horses which they exported throughout the ancient Afro-Asiatic Dominion.

Genesis 10 tells us that Sheba was a Kushite whose royal ancestors originated in ancient Kush.  This is supported by the fact that the world's oldest saddles are from Nubia and the Upper Nile region that was Kush.

Abraham and his wife Keturah were descendants of Sheba, Ham's great grandson. Sheba was a contemporary of Eber, Shem's great grandson. Eber’s son Joktan married a daughter of Sheba. She named their firstborn son Sheba, after her father, according to the cousin-bride's naming prerogative.
Map showing Sheba and the Joktanite Clans
Keturah bore Abraham six sons.  The firstborn was Joktan, named after Keturah's father. The Joktanite clans still live in the region of southern Arabia. They were close kin to the people of Sheba.

It is interesting to note that the horse was associated with the Sun among the Afro-Arabians. During his reform, Josiah banned horses as a religious symbol. II Kings 23:11 reports that "He removed the horses that the kings of Judah had dedicated to the sun at the entrance to the House of the Lord."  This may be due to the decadent practice of horse marriage in the Yedic tradition.

In the earliest Vedic texts we find warnings about transgressing these boundaries. These warn against actions and words that insult the gods, against homosexuality, and against sexual relations with animals. Later Hinduism reflects the different worldview of the Aryan nvaders who entered from the north and subdued the Sudroid (Afro-Asiatic) peoples who lived there. The horse while regarded as noble, was never deified in Afro-Asiatic religion. Sexual relations with a horse or any animal was an unthinkable violation of the boundaries set by God in creation. Not so among Hindu rulers after the Aryan invasion.  The royal fertility ritual called Asvamedha yajna involved the king’s principal wife in a nightlong copulation with the king's most prized dead horse.




The paleo-Hebrew inscription on this 7th-century seal reads, Belonging to Asayahu, servant of the king.





Thursday, September 1, 2011

Confirmation of Biblical Populations

Alice C. Linsley


The first rulers listed in Genesis 4-6 lived in the Chad Basin during the late Holocene. This includes Kain, Seth, Enoch and Noah. At that time Lake Chad had an area of close to 200,000 miles. As the climate changed and the water level receded, what was once a single lake became at least three separate lakes: Lake Chad, Lake Bodele and Lake Fitri. The 10,000 year skeletons unearthed by Paul Sereno at Gobero in Niger were buried on the edge of a paleolake on the northwestern rim of the Chad Basin. The Gobero site is the earliest known cemetery in the Sahara and the large lake was likely another part of Lake Mega-Chad.



Noah and the other Chadic rulers of Genesis controlled commerce on the interconnected waters systems. These were their roads by which they conquered other territories and spread their worldview.


The Oldest Known Language

Chadic is one of the best researched branches of the Afro-Asiatic language phylum. According to Genesis, the first rulers: Kain, Seth and Enoch are associated with the region where Chadic is spoken.  This includes Chad, Northern Cameroon, Northern Nigeria, and Southeastern Niger in an area around Lake Chad. The area is called Bor'No, which means "Land of Noah." This is the only region on Earth that has place names reflecting the rulers listed in Genesis 4 and 5. 

Chadic is the most diversified of the Afro-Asiatic languages and considered the most ancient subgroup within the Afro-Asiatic phylum. The antiquity of Chadic river populations is attested by the discovery of an 8000 year old black mohagany dugout in Dufuna in the Upper Yobe valley along the Komadugu Guna River in Northern Nigeria.  This region was much wetter at the time that the rulers listed in Genesis lived there.

The "Dufuna boat" is about 4000 years older than the oldest boat found in Egypt.

It was a time when the major water systems of West Central Africa were connected.  Around 8000 years ago Lake Chad had an area of 249,000 miles (400,000 km) and a depth of 586 feet. The Komadugu Guna River connected Lake Chad and the Benue Trough, making it possible to travel by boat from Lake Chad to the Atlantic Ocean.


Genesis tells the story of how Kain left his home and went eastward to a place where he married the daughter of a Chadic chief named Nok (Enoch) and built and named a "city" after his firstborn son Enoch.  Enoch the Younger was named by Kain's wife after her father, indicating that she was Kain's cousin and her firstborn was heir to the throne of his maternal grandfather. We can place Kain and Enoch in the region of Northern Nigeria (Nok and Kano).
Genesis then tells us about Lamech who had two wives, typical of the pattern of the Chadic rulers.  By one wife he had a daughter named Naamah who married her patrilineal cousin or uncle Methuselah and named their firstborn son Lamech, after her father.  Lamech the Younger was the heir to the throne of his maternal grandfather.
Lamech the Younger was the father of Noah, a Chadic ruler whose terriotry included Bor'No, meaning "Land of Noah." It is in the region of Lake Chad, which at the time that Noah lived was a very large lake. Noah's flood was likely the result of a monsoon which swelled the lake region over which Noah ruled.
Noah's three sons were Ham, Shem and Japheth. Ham and Shem appear to have been the firstborn sons by two different wives and the leading Chadic lines descending from Noah. The exclusive intermarriage of their lines has been confirmed by analysis of the Genesis 4 and 5 data and by mtDNA studies. The mtDNA (L3f) of Chadic speaking populations involves a relatively homogenous group, with lower diversification than the other Afro-Asiatic branches, including the Semitic and Kushitic. The most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of the L3f dates to about 8000 years ago, the same time period that Noah would have lived with his two wives to whom he was related by blood.

Since there were only two thrones (or two ruling houses) there were only two possible heirs. Other sons were sent-away. As Ham and Shem were the ruling sons, Japheth was likely a sent-away son who moved into the Upper Nile region where some of his descendants have been identified as the Magyar-ab (the Magyar Tribe). Likely there was intermarriage between Nilotic peoples and Chadic, especially in the case of Japheth. This has been confirmed by mtDNA studies of the L3f haplogroup that show that the only non-Chad Basin sequence in the L3f3 subhaplogroup is from the Upper Nile/Ethiopia. The TMRCA of the L3f3 sub-haplogroup is 8,000 years ago, which aligns with the data from the Genesis 4-5 king lists, as well as the evidence from archaeology, linguistics and biblical anthropology.

Other of Japheth's descendants moved north into what is today the region of Hungary. Hungarians called themselves "Magyar."