tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-688820610845171516.post1450779886784154496..comments2024-03-24T11:03:03.106-07:00Comments on Just Genesis : The Dispersal of Archaic HumansAlice C. Linsleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13069827354696169270noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-688820610845171516.post-85613011519611054982017-09-01T09:08:32.267-07:002017-09-01T09:08:32.267-07:00Mann,
There is no physical or genetic evidence to...Mann,<br /><br />There is no physical or genetic evidence to support the view that archaic hominid fossils were proto-humans. Certainly they were not animals. The hunted, butchered and ate animals and controlled fire 3 million years ago.<br /><br />Here are some articles that you may find helpful:<br /><br />http://jandyongenesis.blogspot.com/2017/08/the-historical-adam.html<br /><br />http://biblicalanthropology.blogspot.com/2010/10/overview-of-human-origins.html<br /><br />http://jandyongenesis.blogspot.com/2013/09/what-is-meant-by-term-kind-in-genesis.html<br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Alice C. Linsleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13069827354696169270noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-688820610845171516.post-64671862059394692292017-03-25T17:59:56.468-07:002017-03-25T17:59:56.468-07:00The scientist from Reasons to Believe assert that ...The scientist from Reasons to Believe assert that archaic humans were mere "animals" some type of species of an animal. What are your thoughts? Mannahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15329676748565847421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-688820610845171516.post-20225593345106126382013-12-29T16:45:49.676-08:002013-12-29T16:45:49.676-08:00I am aware of the genetic testing of this African ...I am aware of the genetic testing of this African American whereby the Y chromosome of archaic humans is now set at over 300,000 years. However, I believe that Lucy and her community were fully human and that humans appeared suddenly and unheralded about 3.8 million years ago.Alice C. Linsleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13069827354696169270noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-688820610845171516.post-48024321091042106972013-12-28T08:40:55.386-08:002013-12-28T08:40:55.386-08:00Alice,
You need to study these latest findings.
...Alice,<br /><br />You need to study these latest findings.<br /><br />http://www.yourgeneticgenealogist.com/2013/03/citizen-science-helps-to-rewrite-y.html<br /><br />http://uanews.org/story/human-y-chromosome-much-older-than-previously-thought<br /><br /><br />CharlesAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-688820610845171516.post-21164385880710222422013-12-18T03:39:11.405-08:002013-12-18T03:39:11.405-08:00Circumcision originated in the Sudan and had nothi...Circumcision originated in the Sudan and had nothing to do with mushrooms. <br /><br />The oldest human fossils date to 3.4 million years and though the brain cavity was small, it was proportional to the body size. Further, brain size does not indicate complexity of thought. Complexity of thought merely requires observation of the binary features in the order of creation and binary features in the human anatomy (bilateralism and bicamaral brain). Lucy and her community had both. See these two articles:<br /><br />http://biblicalanthropology.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-binary-aspect-of-biblical-worldview.html<br /><br />http://biblicalanthropology.blogspot.com/2013/07/does-binary-feature-signal-greater.html<br /><br />I encourage you to use the INDEX here at Just Genesis and the INDEX at Biblical Anthropology to pursue your research. You may email me also: aproeditor-at-gmail-dot-com with short questions and I will answer the best I can.<br /><br />Best wishes!<br />Alice C. Linsleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13069827354696169270noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-688820610845171516.post-78757273350435526422013-12-17T17:07:39.652-08:002013-12-17T17:07:39.652-08:00Allegro sugested that the language used by the sum...Allegro sugested that the language used by the sumerians and other near places had words that referred to things of the fertility cults and thier sacrements. The tendencies people have to debunk christianity is unfortante because the research that is being port forth is in aggrevation. So i have wondered what are the truths he imagine. How influenced were our ancestors by sacrements. I learned that because of the growth cycle of mushrooms it was seen as god manifested on earth not forgetting its mind bending powers. I read that there is a connections with the ancients the mushroom and the circumcised penis. And if there was obvious connections with these cults i cant see every religion included i do not agree with allegro either. But i do fill my curiosity on the subject has reason. <br />I mention terrence mnkenna because i discarded his theory of garden of eden because he felt adam represents man and not one man. He says that if we did evolve something increased our brain function exponently in the last 2of million years based on the scientific model. He says that the garden of eden is a place where we left the african swamps as ape man living in trees to gathers of what's available on the plain lands. Psilosybin mushroom being one food which caused such new thought. I think now his theory is more interesting since your suggesting pre adam. But old mythology says man created rather then evolved.<br />Mam i use a phone to do this typing and i hate it. Are you available for phone chat i have hours of questions and i think you have a neat perspective and i think you can help me with my researchAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-688820610845171516.post-88806650844472952192013-12-17T15:46:47.721-08:002013-12-17T15:46:47.721-08:00Allegro's thesis that Christianity emerges out...Allegro's thesis that Christianity emerges out of the fertility cults of the Ancient Near east is wrong. Christianity, in its core belief, is much older that these cults and can be traced to Abraham's Nilo-Saharan ancestors.<br />I'm not very familiar with McKenna's work, but seem to remember something about hallucinogenic substances.<br /><br />Crowley is into Kabbalistic mysticism, but that symbolism is not consistent with the binary worldview of the ancient Nilo-Saharans. I don't regard any of these writers to be scholars.Alice C. Linsleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13069827354696169270noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-688820610845171516.post-44222450377523314452013-12-17T14:09:49.918-08:002013-12-17T14:09:49.918-08:00What do you think of john allegro . Terrence mecke...What do you think of john allegro . Terrence meckenna. Aleister crowley. Or the lady that founded the theological society. All suggest different histories as you do and how do they tie inAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com