Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Forty Days and Forty Nights

Numbers are an interesting and useful device in tracking the tribal and ethnic origins of a document. For example, the Chinese avoid using the number four, which they regard as a bad omen, yet four is a sacred number to the Plains Indians of North America and is used in their ceremonies. The number four, representing the directional poles, is an essential part of preparing the gound for the Oglala's Vision Quest.

In the Bible we are able to track the origin of some narratives using number symbolism. The Bible comes to us from the Afro-Asiatics whose number symbolism can be classified into western and eastern traditions. In the Hamitic-Nilotic tradition the number forty appears often, but forty doesn't appear in the Mesopotamia-Babylonian tradition.

For example, the story of Noah's flood speaks of rain for "forty days and forty nights", but in the Book of Daniel, which is rich in number symbolism, the number forty doesn't appear even once. The Book of Daniel comes from ancient Babylon. And all the evidence of Genesis points to Noah's flood taking place in the region of Mega-Chad in west central Africa.

The number forty in the western Afro-Asiatic tradition relates to the periodic forty day flooding of the Nile when people living near the banks had to leave their homes. The second forty - forty days AND FORTY NIGHTS - relates to the additonal forty days they had to wait for the waters to receed before they could return to their homes.†

So "the forty days and forty nights" of rain during Noah's flood indicates that this story's origins is not Mesopotamia, but Africa. Likewise Israel's forty years of wandering in the wilderness indicates that this story's roots are in Egypt.

† The Coptic monks speak of the forty days, always aware of the connection to the periodic flooding of the Nile which dispersed nutrient-rich silt over the farm land. Read here about a Coptic monk's understanding of Genesis.

3 comments:

Michael Kruse said...

I've got a question not related directly to this post. The Genesis genealogies list that X became the father of Y and lived Z many years. I've seen some suggest that statistically there is a non-random array of total years. Any thoughts on the significance of the number of years in these texts?

Alice C. Linsley said...

The years ascribed to these rulers of old are symbolic. To understand the numerical meaning we need to gain more understanding of the Afro-Asiatic number symbolism. These numbers are definitely not random. You might find this helpful:

http://jandyongenesis.blogspot.com/2007/07/what-about-those-really-old-dudes.html

Michael Kruse said...

Perfect! Thanks.