Tuesday, May 1, 2007

Lamech Segment Analysis


Lamech Segment: Genesis 4

Explanation of Symbols
O Female
Δ Male
= Marriage
/ Line of descent
_ Siblings


Lamech Segment Analysis
© 1998 Alice C. Linsley


Lamech is a variant of the royal la-melech found on hundreds of Egyptian seals. La-melech means "of the king." The marriage and ascendancy pattern revealed in this diagram is identical to that of Abraham and his two wives, and Moses' father and his two wives, and to Samuel's father and his two wives.

Analysis of the Lamech story reveals that this Nilo-Saharan ruler had two wives, following the marriage and ascendancy pattern of Abraham's Horite ancestors.  However, Lamech is said to have placed his wives in separate households on an east-west axis instead of a north-south axis, as was the case with his righteous descendent Abraham. Sarah resided in Hebron and Keturah in Beersheba to the south. Abraham's father Terah maintained wives in Haran and Ur to the south. The location of the wives is significant because their positions marked the southern and northern boundaries of the chief’s territory. The Creator’s territory was marked by the solar arch from east to west.

Lamech’s two wives lived in settlements on a east-west axis. As the Hebrew scholar Theodor Gaster noted their names Adah and Zillah indicate dawn and dust. This rounds out the picture of Lamech's arrogance, for besides killing a man without impunity, he set himself as an equal to God.

The key to understanding the marriage and ascendancy pattern in Genesis 4 and 5 and throughout the whole of Horite history, is the person of Naamah, Lamech's daughter. Naamah, married her patrilineal cousin Methuselah (Gen. 5:26) and named their first-born son Lamech, after her father. This cousin bride's naming prerogative makes it possible to trace the ancestry of Jesus Christ back to Cain and Seth, whose line intermarried.

In Genesis 4 only sons are listed as they became the rulers. However, this doesn't mean that Cain had not daughters.  One of Cain's unnamed daughters married her cousin Enosh (listed in Genesis 5)and named their first-born son Kenan after her father. Kain and Kenan are linguistically equivalent names. Likewise Irad's unnamed daughter married her cousin Mahalalel and named their first-born son Jared, after her father. Irad and Jared are linguistically equivalent. Methushael's daughter married her cousin Enoch and named their first-born son Methuselah, again linguistic equivalents.

Factoring the daughters into the geneological picture of Genesis 4 and 5 clarifies the kinship pattern of Abraham's Horite ancestors. Our clue to look to the daughters is the person of Naamah, daughter of Lamech. The consistency of the pattern throughout Genesis 4 and 5 indicates that these lists represent very old and authentic king lists.

It is difficult to establish a time framework for the rulers listed in Genesis 4 and 5, but it is safe to say that these lines of descent, with the daughters marrying their patrilineal parallel cousins, represent a very old pattern for the Horite rulers, going back to at least 4000 B.C.


Related reading: Lamech's Story and Horite Kingship; Methuselah's Wife; The Horite Marriage and Ascendancy Pattern; The Life Spans of Methuselah and Lamech; St. John Chrysostom on Lamech's Speech; The Horite Ancestry of Jesus Christ; The Seventh Seal and Silence in Heaven

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree. Very interesting read. I have read through other commentaries and they mostly only scrape the surface of a superficial cain/wicked:lamech/wicked storyline. Many thanks.

Alice Linsley said...

The casting of Cain's descendants as the evil line (cursed) and Seth's descendants as the good line (blessed) is misleading since the two lines intermarried exclusively, as did the lines of Ham and Shem, and the lines of Nahor and Abraham. The Horites were a caste of ruler-priests and as is characteristic of castes universally, they practiced endogamy.

Rob Oliver said...

Thank you very much for your postings. It has been a big help in my quest to understand these ancient kinships from the scriptures and other sources. I am stock at the line of Lamech. But in order to understand it I have to go back to the line of Methusellah. I do not see the name EDNA in your explanations as being a wife to Methusellah. Is it possible Methusellah married two wives one of which was Naahma? But I see from other sources that Naahma was married to Noah? This is where I need your help. Thanks!

Alice Linsley said...

Greetings, Rob!

How do you know that you are a descendant of Lamech, and which Lamech? Lamech the Elder, named in Genesis 4, or his grandson, Lamech the Younger, who is named in Genesis 5? I'm a curious.

Keep in mind that the ruling lines of Genesis 4 and 5 intermarried.

If you want to know more about Methuselah's lineage, you should also explore Melchizedek's lineage. see this: http://jandyongenesis.blogspot.com/2012/03/who-was-melchizedek.html

Edna does not appear in the Bible. Therefore, I have no verifiable information about her. That comes from the Talmud and I am generally suspect of Talmudic sources. However, it is correct that Methuselah had two wives. Naamah was his patrilineal cousin wife and therefore his second wife, taken before he assumed his rule. His first wife, taken while he was still a young man, would have been his half-sister. She and Methuselah would have had the same father - Enoch - but different mothers.