Followers

Showing posts with label Alice C. Linsley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Alice C. Linsley. Show all posts

Thursday, July 13, 2023

About My Book "The First Lords of the Earth"



Dear Readers,

It has been a long time coming (40 years), but my book The First Lords of the Earth: An Anthropological Study is now available to purchase on Amazon. Purchase options include Kindle, paperback, and hardcover. All are priced to accommodate the book lover on a tight budget.

This paradigm-shifting book identifies the social structure and religious beliefs of the early Hebrew ruler-priest caste (6000-4000 years ago), their dispersion out of Africa, their territorial expansion, trade routes, and influence on the populations of the Fertile Crescent and Ancient Near East.

I was able to make a rather complex subject easy to understand. I hope you will buy the book and discover answers to some perennial questions, such as:
  • Who were the Horite Hebrew and the Sethite Hebrew?
  • Where is the oldest known site of Horite Hebrew worship?
  • Why did so many Hebrew men have two wives?
  • What was the difference in status between wives and concubines?
  • What types of authority did the biblical Hebrew recognize?
  • What were some symbols of authority among the early Hebrew?
  • How did their acute observation of the patterns in nature inform their reasoning?
  • If Judaism is NOT the Faith of the early Hebrew, what did they believe?

It is ancient history, anthropology, and Biblical studies wrapped into one fascinating read. I hope you will find it helpful and informative.


Best wishes to you all,

Alice C. Linsley


Related reading: The First Lords and Messianic Expectation; The First Lords and Their Authority; The First Lords is a Paradigm-Shifting Book; Response to a Review of First Lords of the Earth


Tuesday, November 29, 2022

Is it Possible to Speak of the Proto-Gospel?


Dr. Alice C. Linsley


Just Genesis presents an "anthropological sleuthing of pre-Abrahamic origins." I have identified the marriage and ascendency pattern of Abraham's Hebrew caste and have demonstrated that this pattern drove the early Hebrew into distant lands where they established territories as early as 4000 BC. The dispersal of the early Hebrew kingdom builders was driven by the practice of sending away sons.

The early Hebrew believed in God Father and God Son and anticipated the incarnation of the Son by divine overshadowing of a virgin of their ruler-priest caste (Luke 1). This expectation is expressed in the first Messianic promise of Scripture - Genesis 3:15 - given to Abraham's ancestors. Some of those ancestors are named in the King Lists of Genesis 4, 5, 10 and 11.

I want to thank the faithful readers of Just Genesis. You have been an excellent sounding board as I have pursued the research on Abraham and the Horim/Horite Hebrew ancestors. I appreciate that you recognize the unique nature of this blog. Just Genesis is unique in these aspects:

  • takes an anthropological approach to the study of Genesis
  • acknowledges the great age of the earth and of human existence
  • rejects aspects of Darwinian theory that lack material evidence
  • asserts that Genesis interprets itself on questions of origins
  • shows that the first verifiably historical persons in Genesis are kings listed in Genesis 4 and 5
  • examines the material in its original cultural context, that of ancient Nilotic peoples
  • argues that Genesis isn't about human origins as much as it is about the origin of Messianic expectation among Abraham's ancestors
All the articles at Just Genesis are listed by topic alphabetically in the INDEX. Articles on Biblical Anthropology can be found at my other blog by that name.

About one-quarter of Genesis is the story of God’s dealings with Abraham and his ancestors (chapters 1-12). The other chapters deal with Abraham's descendants before the establishment of Israel. Because this is so, we recognize that the promise concerning the coming of the Seed of God by the Woman (Gen. 3:15) does not originate with the Jews. It is much older. We may speak of it as the "Proto-Gospel" because the Horite and Sethite Hebrew believed that the Son of God would be miraculously conceived, and that in his repose he would proclaim glad tidings to those in Hades. A Horite Hebrew song found at the royal complex at Ugarit speaks of Horus (HR) who descends to the place of the dead "to announce good tidings." 

The Seed of God was expected to crush the serpent's head. This early Hebrew expectation was expressed in the Pyramid Texts, dating to 2400 BC. "Horus has shattered (tbb, crushed) the mouth of the serpent with the sole of his foot (tbw)" (Utterance 388).

They believed that the Son of God would rise on the third day. A reference to the third day resurrection is found in the Pyramid Texts: "Oh Horus, this hour of the morning, of this third day is come, when thou surely passeth on to heaven, together with the stars, the imperishable stars." (Utterance 667) Jesus' third-day resurrection fulfilled that Horite Hebrew expectation in every detail.

The Messianic reference in Psalm 110:1 - The Lord says to my Lord: "Sit at My right hand until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet." - is expressed 1000 years earlier in the Coffin Texts (Passage 148). "I am Horus, the great Falcon upon the ramparts of the house of him of the hidden name. My flight has reached the horizon. I have passed by the gods of Nut. I have gone further than the gods of old. Even the most ancient bird could not equal my very first flight. I have removed my place beyond the powers of Set, the foe of my father Osiris. No other god could do what I have done. I have brought the ways of eternity to the twilight of the morning. I am unique in my flight. My wrath will be turned against the enemy of my father Osiris and I will put him beneath my feet in my name of 'Red Cloak'." (Myth and Symbol in Ancient Egypt by R.T. Rundle Clark, p. 216)

Jesus subdues the Father's enemies so that God's children might live and prosper. This is expressed in Psalm 2:12: "Kiss the Son, lest he be angry and you be destroyed in your way, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him."

In the Egyptian Book of the Dead, Horus is called the "advocate of his father" (cf. 1 John 2:1).

The expectation of the coming of the Son of God was preserved by Abraham's ancestors to whom the promise was first made in Eden, a well-watered region that extended from the sources of the Nile to the Tigris-Euphrates Valley.

The oldest known site of Horite Hebrew worship is at Nekhen on the Nile. The Hebrew ruler-priests served at many of the ancient Sun Cities. They gave the world the earliest known resurrection texts.


Waiting for the Eternal King 

The Genesis King Lists help us to understand the Bible's purpose and what we might call the "proto-Gospel" or the pattern upon which the prophets reflected and whereby Jesus Messiah would be identified as the fulfillment of Genesis 3:15. 

From beginning to end, the Bible is about the royal ancestry of Jesus Christ. It is possible to trace His ancestry because of the cousin bride's naming prerogative, whereby the cousin bride named her first-born son after her father. This is why there are two named Enoch, two named Lamech, two named Nahor, two named Esau, etc. Lamech the Elder (Gen. 4) bragged to his two wives, and his daughter Naamah gave birth to Lamech the Younger (Gen. 5). Naamah named her first-born son after her father. This is one of many examples in the Old Testament of the cousin bride's naming prerogative.

The cousin-bride's naming prerogative is found from Genesis 4 to Numbers and beyond, so it is not coincidental. Rather it is a feature of the unique marriage pattern of the early Hebrew. Many scholars (Noth, Albright, Speiser, etc.) concluded that Genesis 4 and Genesis 5 represent different oral or textual traditions of the same ruling line. This is NOT what the Bible claims, however, and I take the Bible's claims very seriously. Genesis claims that the rulers listed in Genesis 4 are the descendants of Cain and those listed in Genesis 5 are the descendants of Seth. The correspondence of names (Enoch/Enosh, Kain/Kenan, Irad/Jared, Lamech/Lamech, etc.) between the two lists has to do with the cousin-bride's naming prerogative, something that I discovered about 20 years ago using kinship analysis, a tool of anthropology. 

The kinship pattern of these early Hebrew rulers reflects characteristics typical of ancient castes. One of those characteristics is caste endogamy. The high-ranking rulers practiced bride exchange to strengthen the caste bonds.

All of the men listed in Genesis chapters 4 and 5 are rulers with two wives. One wife was a half-sister (as was Sarah to Abraham) and the other was either a patrilineal niece or a cousin (as was Keturah to Abraham). The cousin bride named her first-born son after her father because this son would serve as a high official in the territory of his maternal grandfather. Lamech's daughter, Naamah, married her patrilineal cousin, Methuselah, and named their first-born son Lamech. This son of Methuselah would serve in Lamech the Elder's territory as he belonged to the household of Lamech. 




Jesus Messiah is a direct descendant of the early Hebrew ruler-priests. As they regarded the Sun as the symbol of the Creator, divine appointment was expressed by overshadowing. Hathor, the mother of Horus, is consistently shown in ancient iconography as divinely overshadowed. The Greek word Horus is derived from the ancient Egyptian HR, meaning Most High One.




When the Virgin Mary asked how she was to become the mother of the Messiah, the angel answered, "The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God." (Luke 1:35)

Thursday, December 23, 2021

About Alice C. Linsley

 


Alice C. Linsley (M.Div.; D. Litt. honoris causa) is a Christian apologist with special training in Biblical Anthropology, an empirical approach to the canonical tests. She was an adjunct professor of Ethics, Philosophy, and World Religions at Midway University (Kentucky) for fourteen years.

Her address to the International Catholic Congress of Anglicans is available here:
ICCA 2015: Alice Linsley - YouTube

Her writings have appeared in numerous magazines, newspapers, journals, and virtual sources in the United States, Europe, and Australia.

She contributes to Virtueonline. Some of the publications there include:

"Freeing God from Gender and Tradition"
"Christianity Lacks Originality"
"Why Women Were Never Priests"
"Ten Objections to Women Priests"


She is a member of the American Scientific Affiliation (ASA) and one of the founding members of Christian Women in Science (CWiS).

Alice manages the international Facebook forum The Bible and Anthropology, a working group that includes anthropologists, archaeologists, linguists, Bible scholars, students, and clergy from many denominations. Members represent various religious traditions including Christianity, Hinduism, Islam and Judaism. 

Testimonials about her research can be found here:


Interviews with Alice C. Linsley have appeared in the following periodicals and radio broadcasts:

Wim Houtman, Nederlands Dagblad
Zaji Travel Magazine
Orthodox Radio of Canada
“From Canterbury to Constantinople” Frank Lockwood
“Stepping into the Stream” Road to Emmaus Interview
Illumined Heart Podcast” Ancient Faith Radio


She manages and writes for the following blogs:

Biblical Anthropology
Distinctive Discipleship
Ethics Forum
Just Genesis
Philosophers' Corner
STEM Education
(CWiS)


Alice has lived in Spain, Greece, Iran, the Philippines, and the United States, and she has traveled in Europe, Southeast Asia, India, and Australia.

Alice is available to speak at conferences.


Related reading: Index of Topics at Just Genesis; Index of Topics at Biblical Anthropology; INDEX of Topics at Ethics Forum; INDEX of Topics at Philosophers' Corner; INDEX of Topics at STEM Education (CWiS)

Saturday, September 8, 2018

A Little About Sources





Alice C. Linsley


A reader of JUST GENESIS who is also a member of the Facebook forum "The Bible and Anthropology" has written: "I'm curious if you know of a Biblical Commentary on Genesis that would give the historical events as you do on the blog? (I like what you did with the story of Noah, for example)."

I provide a list of Bible Commentaries on Genesis here. It is not a comprehensive list, but it provides a broad range of writers and perspectives. I should write a commentary also, but so few people read these days that I wonder if it is worth the effort. We live in a time when you are heard only if your voice is louder than the other voices in the room, or if you can state your position in 10 words or less.

Honestly, it would be impossible to reduce nearly 40 years of research into a pithy paragraph about the roots of the Messianic Faith extending back into deep antiquity and how Genesis reveals a shift from the divine Father-Son relationship to YHWH who has no son.

The YHWH cult enters the picture about 700-250 BC, long after the time of Abraham and his Horite Hebrew ancestors. YHWH does not have a son. Therefore, we find the introduction of a new idea about God, one that expresses the Jewish understanding of God and is removed from the Proto-Gospel with its understanding of the divine Father and divine Son.

There are competing narratives in Genesis that produce contextual incongruities. Messianic references are found throughout the Bible and the kinship pattern of the Messiah's people is consistent from Genesis to the Gospels, but the Messianic Faith of Abraham and his Nilotic ancestors becomes suppressed under the final hand of rabbinic Judaism in which there is no Son of God.

Nevertheless, we know which is the older tradition. It is the one which speaks of the "Seed" of God (Gen. 3:15) coming into the world and trampling down the serpent. The work published at JUST GENESIS attempts to reconnect Christianity to that older Tradition. We discuss this at The Bible and Anthropology Forum here, for those interested.

In my research I've attempted to focus on data rather than on theological speculation and denominational interpretations. This is an empirical approach to the study of the Bible and I refer to the work as the science of "Biblical Anthropology" to distinguish it from theological anthropology which is, in my view, highly speculative.

This project has stimulated my growth intellectually, spiritually and socially. I have made friends with people around the globe and I hope the research has helped some people to better understand the Bible. I believe the whole of the Canon makes sense only when seen through the lens of the Messianic Faith. Madison Gentsch, my friend and long-time reader, knows my work represents "anthropological sleuthing" of the pre-Abrahamic origins of the Messianic Faith.

Image result for image of Ernest L.Schusky Manual for Kinship AnalysisThe religious authorities in Jerusalem were so far removed from the Messianic Tradition of their Nilotic ancestors that they didn't recognize Jesus as Messiah. Neither did the disciples at first. Jesus had to reconnect them to the Tradition. This is what happened on the road to Emmaus. They said to each other, "Didn't our hearts burn within us as He talked with us on the road and explained the Scriptures to us?" (Luke 24:32)

I am often asked about my sources. I suppose that is implied in the reader's question about a Biblical Commentary on Genesis that would give the historical events as I do on the blog. The sources are too numerous to cite, but the reader who follows links in the articles and pursues the topic further by attending to the articles under "Related reading" will find satisfaction.

My work is based on the earlier work of Bible scholars, anthropologists, linguists, and philosophers. None presents the material as I do, but many present the data upon which I base conclusions.

I have been influenced by the work of the Bible scholar Brevard Childs, and that is why I define the emerging science of Biblical Anthropology as a study of the canonical texts. As with any discipline it is necessary to set boundaries, and there is the broadest agreement on the Old and New Testaments as they are known today. I also believe that these texts provide sufficient data to advance our anthropological knowledge and understanding of the many biblical populations.

I owe my knowledge of kinship analysis to the great anthropologist Ernest L. Schusky. His "Manual for Kinship Analysis" is always ready at hand. Without this knowledge I could not diagram and analyse the marriage and ascendancy pattern of the biblical Hebrew. Nor could I prove that the persons listed in Genesis 4, 5, 10, 11, 25 and 36 are historical persons and their kinship is authentic.

The work of Umberto Cassuto has been very helpful. According to Cassuto, Lamech is related to the Akkadian word lumakku, meaning “priest” (Commentary on Genesis, Vol. 1, p. 233). The word indicates a junior priest of the Hebrew ruler-priest caste, and is related to the Akkadian words maklu - burnt offering, and malku - ruler-priest (which is sometimes a synonym of Šarru - king).

In his extraordinary Commentary on Genesis (Volume 1), Cassuto wrote concerning the lifespan discrepancies of the rulers: "What is the cause of the divergences between the three texts, and which recension has preserved the original figures? Much has been written on this subject, and the answer remains in dispute" (p. 265). 

Cassuto believed that the original figures are preserved in the Masoretic text and if we pursue this we discover the trail of Cain (7), Lamech the Elder (77) and Lamech the Younger (777). Lamech the Younger is the father of Noah. This Lamech is assigned the number 777, symbolic of full righteousness. 


 
E.A. Speiser's Anchor Bible Commentary on Genesis helped to clarify for me the way that a ruler and his grandson would have the same name. For example Lamech the Elder and Lamech the Younger. However, Speiser missed that this is due to the cousin bride's naming prerogative.

Consider the case of Deuteronomy 21:16, which Speiser translates this way:
"He shall not be able to give the birthright to the younger son of the beloved wife, in
disregard of the older son of the un-loved wife."
(Anchor Bible Commentary on Genesis, p. 118)

Analysis of the kinship pattern of the Horite Hebrew shows that the ruler had two wives. That is made clear in the cases of Lamech, Terah, Abraham, Jacob, Amram, Moses, and Elkanah. 

Now we see why Speiser's translation is a good one. He distinguishes between two wives and two firstborn sons. Deuteronomy 21:16 forbids breaking the kinship pattern by giving to the firstborn of the cousin bride (the second wife) what rightfully belonged to the firstborn son of the sister bride (the wife of the man's youth).

Speiser also contributes to our understanding of the term "Qanyty" as having an Akkadian context which, if we scratch deeper, we find is really the Kushite context of Nimrod's kingdom. Nimrod was a son of Kush (Gen. 10). In Genesis 4:1 Cain's mother gives birth and declares, "Kaniti (qaniti/qanyty)." This is interpreted to mean Kain/Cain. However, this is an Akkadian word that is related to the Nilotic suffix "itti" referring to rulers. "I have gotten a man, as has YHWH" should read "I have begotten a ruler..."

This is a Messianic reference. Kaniti/Qanyty is a reference to a king, born by God's grace. This is the second Messianic reference in the Bible. The first is Genesis 3:15, which refers to the "Woman" (not Eve) who is to bring forth the Seed of God who tramples down the serpent.

The Akkadian itti, as in itti šarrim, means "with the king" or "for the king." It is attached to the names of royal persons and dignitaries. Even today the Nilotic Oromo attach itti to names: Onditi, Kaartuumitti, Finfinneetti and Dimashqitti. That itti is associated with Nilotic rulers is evident in the name of the great Egyptian queen Nefertitti.

Kain has many linguistic equivalents: Qayan, Cain, and Kahn, as in Genghis Kahn, and the female variant is Candace or Kandake. All these words refer to a king/queen or ruler. The first kings named in the Genesis king lists are Kain and his brother Seth. They were Middle Bronze Age rulers as is evidenced by the technologies mentioned in Genesis 4-6. They were not the first people on earth.

This is evident from analysis of the Genesis 4 and 5 lists where we discover that Cain and Seth married the daughters of a ruler named Enoch. These daughters named their first born sons "Enoch" after their father, suggesting that they were the cousin brides of Cain and Seth. Enoch is a royal name. It refers to "one who ascends." Enoch would have been a contemporary of Adam.



Modupe Oduyoye, a Nigerian philologist wrote "The Sons of Gods and the Daughters of Men" and that book helped me make connections between Genesis and African names and religious practices. The book was published in 1984 by Orbis Books, Maryknoll, New York.

In his book, Dr. Oduyoye notes the connection between Adamu Orisa (of Lagos State) and the Hebrew r’ison Adam. He notes that Hebrew Qayin (Kain/Cain) and the Arabic word for smith "qayn" are cognates. He says these words are related to the Yoruba Ogun and Fon Gun, both meaning “patron saint of smiths.” Other examples include Ebira Egene (the metalworker caste) and Hamn Kuno (who is credited with the invention of iron smelting). 

Oduyoye notes that the Hebrew Nod נוד and Nok נוך are almost identical. Kain is said to have wandered in the land of Nod, but that could be Nok in Nigeria, as scholars recognize that the Genesis writer makes this a play on words. If Nok, we have Kain in the vicinity of Lake Chad, Noah's apparent homeland.

I came to a better understanding of the binary (versus dualistic) worldview of the biblical Hebrew by reading the work of the anthropologist Levi-Strauss, and the philosopher Jacques Derrida.

The French anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss observed binary thinking among pre-literate Amazon tribes in the 20th century. In his book, Le cru et le cuit, Strauss explores cultural perceptions of natural/raw-prepared/cooked, and other binary oppositions/sets within primitive cultures. Lévi-Strauss dedicated himself to searching for the "underlying patterns of thought in all forms of human activity." On the basis of his anthropological findings he argued that the primitive mind has the same structures or patterns as the civilized mind. These observations culminated in his famous book Tristes Tropiques, which positioned him as the central figure in the structuralist school.

Jacques Derrida was a French-speaking North African Jew whose thought has contributed to a better understanding of the Semitic interpretative approach to meaning. Derrida's argument is that in examining a binary opposition and reversals, deconstruction brings to light traces of meaning that cannot be said to be present, but which have metaphysical existence. In reality, this is not a new approach to meaning. It is consistent with the binary thought and observations of the Abraham's Horite Hebrew ancestors from whom we receive the binary narratives in Genesis.

The Bible scholars, anthropologists, linguists, and philosophers mentioned in this post provided me with good ideas on how to approach the biblical texts in a more empirical way. However, the data I use to pursue a clearer understanding of the antecedents of the Messianic Faith are dug out of the Bible. Archaeologists dig artifacts to gain a better understanding of the material culture of populations living in the "Holy Land." Biblical Anthropologists dig data out of the Bible to better understand the culture and social patterns of biblical populations from Africa to Europe. The skill sets of the two disciplines are different, but they share a common objective to gain greater clarity.

Over the years I have had to learn many ancient Egyptian words and ancient Akkadian words in order to make linguistic connections. That led me to compile a lexicon for each, which I hope will be helpful to readers. For those who wish to dig deeper, I recommend beginning with the INDEX.

Finally, thank you dear readers for following this blog. Some of you have been with me for over 10 years. God bless you all.

Related reading: Something Older; Biblical Anthropology is the Work of Christians; Christianity Lacks Originality; The Sting of Death



Wednesday, November 6, 2013

Some Jewish Women Noticed My Research


Today I received an email inquiry from a Jewish woman who is teaching other women in her synagogue. Here is what she wrote:

Alice Linsley - I have used some of your work as background material for a small 
women's group in my synagogue as a part of a teaching Sukkot celebration these past 
few years. The material has just been part of my brief oral presentations - not given out 
textually about the women personalities in Torah and Tanach.


But I have had some questions from my group that I would like answered if possible:  [she goes on to ask the questions].

Here is my response:


Hello, Gail.

You are welcome to use whatever you find helpful from my research in the field of Biblical Anthropology. I hold a Master of Divinity degree and have a background (no degree) and special training in kinship analysis, a sub-discipline of cultural anthropology. I studied at the University of Bridgeport in Connecticut. There I had the opportunity to study kinship analysis with a man who had been mentored by Franz Boaz. Boaz also mentored Margaret Meade. You may be aware that many famous anthropologists never held Ph.Ds. They were practitioners, not academics.

My kinship analysis work is unique. It represents a paradigm shift. You may recall from Thomas Kuhn's book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions that almost all major breakthroughs in science have been made by individuals, not by scientists working as groups, or communities of academics.

I teach Introduction to Philosophy, the History of Ethics, and World Religions at Midway College, a small women's college in central Kentucky. I am an adjunct, as I do not have the Ph.D required to be full time faculty. I also write curriculum for the Midway online program.

I was an Episcopal priest for 18 years. I left on the Sunday the Episcopal Church consecrated Gene Robinson, a non-celibate gay bishop. That was 10 years ago. My decision cost me my full time teaching job at another institution, my home, and some friendships. The Lord God, who is good to sinners like me, has provided all my needs over these past 10 years.

I began my anthropological studies after I was asked to teach a study on the book of Genesis about 35 years ago. The class was at my church in Pennsylvania and was for women only. All the commentaries I used were written by men and none provided satisfying answers to the questions the women in the class were asking. I did my best, but after the course ended I had a crisis of faith. I began to doubt that the material was trustworthy. Specifically, I doubted that the people named in Genesis 4, 5, 10 and 11 were historical. I slipped into depression and it was difficult trying to raise my children.

One day it hit me that I could know for sure whether or not the people listed in Genesis 4 and 5 were historical. I could diagram the data and do an analysis, as I have been taught. I went and found my textbook, E.L. Shusky's Manual for Kinship Analysis and I began. It became apparent that Genesis 4 and 5 detail parallel ruling lines that intermarried. I found other features that made me think these were historical people who had a distinctive kinship pattern that involved marriage to patrilineal cousins. In the years that followed I did other diagrams and found the same pattern for Abraham's father Terah and Moses' father Amram. Since then I have traced the identical pattern through the Old Testament to Samuel's father Elkanah and to David's father Jesse.

That marked the beginning of a long journey and one which has led to numerous other important discoveries. There is still much to investigate, and as I am now 64 years of age, I hope that the Lord will raise up some younger people to pursue this work.

Unfortunately, there is not a single institution of higher education in the world that offers course work in Biblical Anthropology. When I suggested it, I was told that this is really Near Eastern Studies, and indeed there are many institutions that offer degrees in N.E. Studies. However, my research traces Abraham's ancestors back to their roots in the Nile Valley and Sudan. This is NOT the Near East, but Africa. Africa remains the blind spot of American education from the elementary school to the post-graduate level. Sigh.

I hope that I have answered your questions. If not, please email me again.

May the Lord bless you and the women as you delve into the sacred writings that the Lord God has so faithfully preserved for us.


Alice C. Linsley

Friday, February 22, 2013

Zaji Magazine Interviews Alice C. Linsley


Alice C. Linsley


Last Summer I did an interview with Zaji Magazine, a "fun, flirty and stylish travel magazine that’s been traipsing the globe since 2007, based in Dallas, Texas with an international editorial team." The interview appeared today. You can read it online where you will see wonderful images.  Here is the text of the Winter 2013 interview:


Image is everything. At least, that’s what Hollywood and the media machine tell us. There is some measure of truth to that especially when it comes to Africa. Africa's image is one of tragedy and pathos. Famine, starving children and war are the first things that normally come to mind.

But you shouldn't judge a book by its cover. Because when you turn the pages of some of humanity's oldest texts, you'll find Mother Africa there shining in her glory, beckoning for you to come and unravel her mysteries.

Anthropologist Alice Linsley has heeded Mother Africa's call - for the last 35 years. She's been studying the ancient Hebrew book of Genesis. It's the story of where Mother Earth's children began this adventure we call life. In fact, it's the territories in Africa (the land of Kush) that are first mentioned before any other "country" in describing the world's lost paradise - Eden.

Alice who describes herself as a Christian anthropologist teaches as an adjunct professor at Midway College in the U.S. Her intriguing blog Just Genesis showcases her 35-year research project. It has an index which lists all topics alphabetically. You can find just about anything you want to know about this ancient text especially about the culture of the people who wrote it.

We chatted with Alice about living the expat life and her Christian faith. Of course, she unraveled some juicy mysteries about the Bible's ancient people and beautiful Mother Africa.


Zaji: You are a Christian anthropologist? What does that mean?


Alice: It means I do my anthropology from a place of Christian faith. Although I donʼt necessarily interpret the anthropological data as a Christian. The data is data and has to speak for itself. Being a Christian in the field of anthropology isnʼt always easy, because there are not a lot of us. But I do find that a lot of data supports the biblical worldview and what the biblical record says about Abraham and his ancestors. Iʼve actually been cutting out a niche for myself in the field of Biblical anthropology.


Zaji: How did you get started in this field?


Alice: Well, I was raised in the military. We lived all over the world. I lived as a child in the Philippines; then in Spain, Greece and Iran. So from a really early age, I was very interested in culture. It was just natural to go into the area of anthropology. I went to seminary and was trained in Divinity. The Old Testament was my special area. Anthropology and the Old Testament came together in the study of the book of Genesis.



Zaji: What places had the biggest impact on your life?


Alice: I enjoyed my time in Iran. I was ready to leave when the time came. I left only one year before the American Hostage crisis. I loved Greece, because that is where I first became exposed to Eastern Orthodoxy and the iconography of the Eastern Church. That was very important. That was formative for me. And I did eventually become Eastern Orthodox myself.

The Philippines was probably the most important of all the places, because I lived there at the youngest age. I lived there age 7 through 9 and my mother worked in those years. I had a Filipino nanny who was very important in my life. She enabled me to see the world through a different cultural perspective. To this day I grieve the loss of my dear Helen. She was a second mom to me.



Zaji: What started you on your faith journey?

Alice: My father was actually raised by his mother who was kind of a 'single mother.' She was married, but her husband lived way off in the desert in California. Her name was Alice Linsley too and she was a Baptist pastor. She was probably one of the first women ordained in Los Angeles County. She was ordained in 1925.

My father grew up hearing his mother preach and had a female model for ministry. All my life I was encouraged to speak out, take a stand as a Christian. My father was a very courageous Christian himself. He spoke out against things he saw in the churches he felt was undermining the biblical faith.

I got a lot of encouragement from my dad. I think he was a little chagrined when I became an Episcopal priest. I think heʼd rather I had become a Baptist pastor, but it didnʼt work out that way.



Zaji: What drew you to the Episcopal Church?


Alice: Well, when I lived in Iran I visited the Anglican Mission there in Isfahan –St. Lukeʼs Anglican Mission. There was an English missionary priest who was in charge of the expatriate congregation. He was an extraordinarily loving, joyful and humble Christian. I havenʼt met too many people like him. His humility was almost breathtaking. The sacrifices he and his family made in order to build up a congregation there in Isfahan under such difficult circumstances were great.

Literally, if you are a Christian in Iran, you are a real Christian, because youʼre going to face persecution for your faith. I was never really content in the Baptist church. I wanted a higher liturgical form of worship. I knew I wasnʼt Roman Catholic, but I did feel comfortable in the Anglican Church.


Zaji: What made you decide to leave the Episcopal Church?


Alice: I opposed my bishop and the direction that the Episcopal Church was going with the ordination of gay and lesbian clergy. I actually left on the Sunday that the Episcopal Church consecrated its first gay bishop – Gene Robinson.

It has been about 9 years since Iʼve been gone. I served an African-American congregation in downtown Lexington, Kentucky. It was extremely difficult. I loved the people. We accomplished a lot in the three years that I was there. They called me “Mother Alice.” The situation became very difficult when the bishop placed a lesbian deacon and the church became divided over that. I stayed as long as I could. I spent three days praying and fasting about the direction I should go. The Lord made it really clear to me what Sunday I was to leave. I didnʼt know that the Sunday the Lord had told me to leave was the Sunday of Gene Robinsonʼs consecration. Trust me, I wouldnʼt have had the courage to do that, because the full weight of my bishopʼs wrath fell upon me. But I was so busy putting out fires in my congregation I wasnʼt paying attention to what was happening nationally in the Church.


Zaji: Thatʼs a lesson in faith. What would you say has been the hardest part of your faith and the most rewarding thing youʼve learned from your faith all your years as a Christian, going through lifeʼs ups and downs?


Alice: Iʼd say God is absolutely trustworthy. That would be the primary thing as I look back and say He has been trustworthy. He has fulfilled every promise. The one promise He has repeated to me all throughout my life is “I am with you always.”

There are so many times when we doubt His promise to be with us always, because we donʼt feel it. We donʼt feel it immediately. But then we can look back and say ʻoh my gosh He was there.' He was carrying me through that situation.ʼ The greatest crisis for me in my faith has been when Iʼve lost loved ones. I think that is true for everybody. It was very hard for me when my mom and dad died, especially when my dad died. I was very close to my father. Family is everything.


Zaji: So let's talk about Genesis. Most of us who've read it get lost in all those genealogies. 'This person begot that person etc...etc...'What are those genealogy lists really about?


Alice: What we really have there are Kings Lists. All of those people listed in Genesis 4, 5 and 11 were rulers. They were what we call Horite Rulers. Horite rulers didn't control one territory. They lived interspersed. The Ancient World had a very definite caste structure, and the Horites happened to be the high-ruling caste. The Horites controlled the waterways all the way from the Niger River in the Benue Trough, which is in Nigeria and Niger all the way to southern India. That was at a time when that part of the world was much wetter and many of those water systems were connected. They were traders. They moved cargo on those great rivers. That's why the Horites are sometimes referred to as the "Khar" or the "Gar"( in Africa, by the way gar, gir or gur refers to trader). And they were dispersed throughout all those populations.

They were record keepers or scribes, which makes sense, because if you're going to move cargo, you've got to keep records of how much and where it's going. How much is paid. So when we talk about Horites, we either talk about rulers, priests or scribes and among them was a sub-caste of metal workers.

Ethnically, the Horites were Kushites. Up to the time of Noah, we probably need to refer to them as Proto-Saharans. The reason being that the word Kushite comes from Kush, who was one of Noah's grandsons.


Zaji: Can you explain further. The Horites (Horim) were worshippers of Horus. Most Jews, Christians and Muslims would consider that pagan.


Alice: That has been so much misinformation out there. I can hardly tell you. The Horites originated in the Sahara. They were not Egyptians. It was the Kushites who first united Egypt. And it was pretty much Kushite religion that was the foundation of Ancient Egyptian religion.

Over time, the Egyptian religion became quite syncretistic and borrowed elements from Babylonian religion. It borrowed elements from Meditarranean religions. You even see some Asian dualism come in.

People are failing to make a distinction between what Abraham's Horite ancestors believed who were Proto-Saharans. The Horites sacred triad was Ra, The Creator God. His emblem was the sun. Ra overshadowed Hathor-Meri, who gave birth to Horus. And Horus is called the Son of God, among the Horites.

Here's another example. Look at the distinction between Hathor and Isis. Isis is a later name for Hathor. Hathor was also actually called Mary. Isn't that interesting? Hathor-Meri is the mother of Horus. Her totem was a cow. That's why she's shown with horns and the sun between the horns. It symbolizes her being overshadowed by the Sun. In Dendera (Egypt, west bank of Nile), there are actually images of Hathor holding her son in a manger.

Another example of misinformation is the idea that Osiris and Ra are the same person. That is simply not correct. The so-called cutting up of Osiris into 15 pieces does not pertain to Horite belief at all. That comes from Babylon. It was a belief that was attributed to Nimrod. Supposedly, Nimrod was cut into 15 pieces.

So, people have to be careful to sort through a lot of misinformation, to understand what the Horites believed, which is quite distinct from the Horus mythology that developed in syncretistic Egyptian religion at a much later date.

To recap: the Horites are the rulers listed in Genesis 4, 5 and 11. These were Abraham's ancestors. What were they trying to communicate with these Kings Lists? These lists tell us about the Horite marriage and ascendancy pattern. Every one of the Horite rulers had two wives. The second wife was taken at a much later age, just before the ruler would ascend to the throne of his father and was always usually a patrilineal cousin or a patrilineal niece. Patrilineal means the man and his bride had a common male ancestor. So, that would be Keturah. Keturah was Abraham's patrilineal cousin.

We see this pattern with all of them. So, it's not something that is a coincidence. It is the pattern for Moses with his two wives. It's the pattern for Abraham with his two wives. It's the pattern for Abraham's father, Terah. It's the pattern for Samuel's priest father, Elkanah. Elkanah had two wives: Hannah who was barren, and Peninah who bore quite a few children.

Interestingly, the cousin bride names her first born after her father. I've given a title to that. I call that the cousin bride naming prerogative. I must be pretty dumb, because it took me about 30 years to identify it. It was right in front of my face all the time.

Once I identified the cousin bride naming prerogative, I realized 'oh my gosh,' this is how we can trace the line of descent from Cain and his brother Seth whose two lines intermarried to Ham and Shem, whose two lines intermarried, to Abraham and his brother Nahor, whose two lines intermarried. And we can trace it all the way to Jesus Christ.
Because remember, Joseph and Mary were cousins. Joseph had another wife, and we know this through church tradition. Mary was his cousin wife. It's the cousin wife that we can trace the line of descent from Genesis 4 and 5 all the way to Jesus Christ. I've actually demonstrated it, and I've put diagrams up on my blog.


Zaji: What have you learned the most about Abraham? About his faith and just about him as a person?

Alice: I believe Abraham was a man who struggled a lot with the responsibilities that he had, as he began to rule over the territory that God provided for him. Remember, Abraham was the youngest of Terah's sons, so he did not receive a territory, but God said 'Look, it's ok...I'm going to give you a territory. Nahor your brother will get a territory according to the human rule, but I'm going to divinely deliver your territory.'

He struggled to be a ruler with two wives and Sarah being barren. That was a great matter of distress for him. There was a great urgency for the child of his sister-wife to be born. The child of the sister-wife is the rightful heir of his biological father. He had other children by Keturah, but that was not how their marriage and ascendancy structure worked. For Abraham to have a rightful heir, it had to be the son born of his half-sister - Sarah.

I really believe this whole project was God-directed, and that my obsession was some kind of divine infection. I don't really know why this happened. But I know this happened almost 36 years ago when I was teaching a women's Bible study on the Book of Genesis.

That's when it started. I realized the ladies were asking such good questions and none of the commentaries that I had were answering those questions very well. And that's when I began to do the research. And amazing little things would happen like a National Geographic would be sitting in front of me at the doctor's office. I would flip through there and found out that metal working chiefs in Niger had two wives. They kept their wives in separate households on a north-south axis. Bingo! I would go to the Scriptures and see if this was the way. And sure enough, Sarah was in Hebron in the north and Keturah was in Beersheba in the South. They kept their wives on a north-south axis.

God wants this information out there. And I really do believe it's because this research concerns the reliability of the biblical record about Abraham's ancestors, Abraham's descendants and how Jesus is a direct descendant of the people to whom God made the first promise back in Genesis 3:15 - that a woman of their ruler-priest line would conceive and bring forth the seed who would crush the serpent's head.

And they must have believed that promise that was made to them and their ancestors, because their priestly lines intermarried exclusively.


Zaji: That's interesting. How that ties back to the Noah and the Flood story….this idea that their priestly lines married exclusively. I found your blog while doing research on Noah. You wrote a fascinating article where you said people need to search for Noah's ark not in Turkey, but in Central Africa.

Alice: There's only one place on the whole surface of the Earth that claims to be Noah's homeland, and that's around the Lake Chad area. The region called Bor-No, which means 'Land of Noah.'

It makes sense. Noah is a descendant of Cain and Seth. Cain and Seth were Proto-Saharans. So, Noah would have been in the Lake Chad area. If that's the case, then he probably would have built his boat out of reeds, because that was an area where reeds were very prevalent. At the time when he lived there, it was a very wet period.


Zaji: How did you begin your research on this?

Alice: The problem is that people are not looking at the etymology of the word. For example, the word Ararat is actually an Arabic word, and Ararat means vehemence.

So what the text is saying is: Noah's ark landed on the Mount of Vehemence. And doesn't that fit the context of the story more. God was angry. God was upset. God was vehement.

The Hebrew language emerges out of something older. We're going to find something much closer to the meaning when we look at the antecedents of Hebrew. Linguists recognize that Arabic is older than Hebrew.

The Dedanite Scripts are the origin of Arabic. The Dedanites were a Horite clan. Dedan is along the Red Sea, in the southwestern part of Arabia. The Dedanites are mentioned a lot in Scripture. That's also the region where the oldest texts in Arabic have ever been found.

The Bible also says Armenia. The AR is actually HAR which means mount. So, it's not Armenia. It's Har Meni meaning Mount Meni. Where is Mount Meni? Mount Meni is in East Africa. It's in the Tanzania area. That's where you would more expect Noah's ark to land, that's closer to where his homeland was.


Zaji: Wow. It kind of makes sense now when you think that the most biodiverse spot on the planet is East Africa's Serengeti, Ngorongoro Crater with all the animals.

Alice: We know from archaeological research that the Saharan rulers and the Egyptian rulers, in fact all the rulers along the Nile - one of their great hobbies was keeping menageries. They had zoos. They loved to collect animals. And when they did, they always collected a male and a female, because they wanted the animals to reproduce.

They'd write about it in their ancient texts. "I acquired two of this animal..." and that's exactly what the Bible says that God tells Noah - "you're to take a pair of these animals." And of course, he would have saved his menagerie. If he knew a flood was coming, wouldn't he save his animals?


Zaji: Lastly, can you elaborate on the Garden of Eden?

Alice: Eden was a large territory. People read, and they think this garden, this small place. We think gardens with what we're familiar with. But Genesis actually says that Eden was a vast region, because it says it was bounded on the east by the Tigris and Euphrates, which is Mesopotamia.

And it was bounded on the west by the Pishon and the Gihon. The Gihon flows all the way down into the Upper Nile region of Havilah where there is good gold and that's Kush.

So it extended from the Sudan all the way down into Ethiopia and all the way to the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. Huge!

That's Eden.



CHECK OUT JUST GENESIS - http://jandyongenesis.blogspot.com

Drop Alice a line with any questions or comments you may have. There's lots to read. Start with the INDEX of topics. It's such a wonderful way to learn about the Bible, and it's true culture and roots. Stay informed!

END


Related: Answers to High School Students' Questions about the Flood; Jesus' Horite Ancestry; Jesus Fulfills the Ancient Horus Myth; Kushite Diversity and Unity; Hazor's Destruction: Another Theory



Thursday, August 18, 2011

Reactions to My Genesis Research


Alice C. Linsley


After more than thirty years of presenting aspects of my Genesis research and engaging various viewpoints, I can accurately anticipate the reaction of different groups to the research.


Racists of all colors

It has not been welcomed by white supremacists because in their worldview nothing good comes out of Africa. White supremists recently took note of this blog and apparently have a bone to pick with me. They seem to think that only white people have contributed to the early development of organized religion. There is no arguing from facts with those who are dedicated to apartheid in America.

Sadly, there is evidence of this racism in the writings of Young Earth creationists. Most of their books contain the Twelve Affirmations and Denials of this movement. Let us consider Affirmation XII.

We affirm that all people living and dead are descended from Adam and Eve...and that the various people groups (with their various languages, cultures, and distinctive physical characteristics, including skin color) arose as a result of God's supernatural judgment at the Tower of Babel..."

The Tower of Babel story explains the division of related dialects into Afro-Arabian and Afro-Asiatic languages. This happened over a period of time, which does not exclude the possibility of divine intervention. The linguistic division occurred before Abraham's time. There are seventeen language families in the world. Each breaks down into hundreds of languages, dialects and sub-dialects. All the people groups mentioned in Genesis Chapter 10 belong to the Afro-Asiatic language group which originated in the Nile region and spread across Arabia, the Levant and Mesopotamia. Genesis tells us that Abraham's ancestors were Kushites, people of dark skin color, so it is ignorant and racist to say that skin color is the result of God's judgment.

Neither has my research been greeted charitably by black supremacists who insist that everything of value comes out of Africa. They would rather ignore the evidence that Asiatics played a large role in the spread of early law codes and the Messianic Faith (pre-Judaism). They tend to forget that all living humans have Africa and their ancestral point of origin.

Black supremists are not to be confused with Afrocentrist scholars such as W.E.B. Dubois, Carter G. Woodson and Clyde A. Winters, all scholars who are concerned with archaeological, linguistic and genetic discoveries related to African peoples, their migration and their contributions.


Biblical literalists

These Biblical literalists or "Fundamentalists" distort what the Bible reveals by imposing an ideology that makes the Bible acceptable to them. It is clear, however, that even these reductionists don’t agree. Some filter the Bible through Calvinism, with its emphasis on divine sovereignty, covenant theology and predestination. Others filter the material through the bestsellers of famous Protestant pastors. Many reductionists filter the Bible through the dispensational framework articulated in the Scofield Bible. This last approach breaks the single strand from Genesis to Revelation into numerous independent strands or “dispensations” in which the unchanging God changes. This would have been both foreign and anathema to Abraham’s Horite people.

Biblical literalists feel threatened when their assumptions about Genesis are questioned. In my view, their Young Earth position presents the greatest obstacles to understanding Genesis and the entire Bible. Their false assumptions are, without doubt, the most pervasive cause of confusion. The righteous tone with which they assert their version of Genesis fools some into believing that Young Earth Creationism is Biblical. In fact, their doctrines are quite contrary to what Genesis reveals.

Perusal of their books and websites causes the educated and scientifically-minded to scratch their heads in wonder. The Earth is only 6000 years old? Humans and dinosaurs co-existed? God created the Grand Canyon with the appearance of great age? These far-fetched conclusions contribute to prejudice against a scientific approach to Genesis, making my work as a Biblical Anthropologist more difficult. Many in the scientific and academic communities assume that all Christians think like Young Earth literalists and are unaware of the remarkable correspondence between the Biblical timeline and scientific studies.

Young Earth Creationists are building a Noah's Ark theme park in Kentucky. It will be a fun place for families and will perpetuate their ideology. Evangelicals who have bought into Darwinian evolutionary theory probably won't visit the park, but Biblical literalists will flock there in droves, as they do to Ken Ham's other attraction, the Creation Museum in Cincinnati.

Young Earth Creationism is declining in popularity among Evangelicals, especially those influenced by the BioLogos crowd which tends to think that Darwinian evolution is the only alternative to literalism, and that is not true. An anthropological approach to Genesis acknowledges Earth's great age and the milleniums of human existence without accepting the unproven tenets of evolution concerning human origins. Biblical Anthropology, as scientific study of the text, requires setting aside both ideological templates in order to determine the meaning in cultural context. This is a labor to which I am fully committed.


East Indians

Another group that attempts to refute my research are East Indians who insist that India is the cradle of the ancient religions and civilizations. I receive emails from them fairly regularly. Contrary to the evidence, they insist that the ancient practice of sacrifice at falcon-shaped altars and metal working came to the Nile and ancient Kush from India. This ignores the evidence of molecular genetics, linguistics, climate studies, anthropology and archaeology which reveal several movements out of Africa into Southern Pakistan and India.

There is also the evidence of place names such as Orisha/Orissa, Borno/Borneo, Karnak/Karnataka, and words such as sarki (priest caste) which is found from Nigeria to Nepal. Many Dravidian settlements and monuments are now submerged under the sea, but originally they were on a land bridge between the Arabian Peninsula and Southern Pakistan. This is sometimes referred to as the "Harappa" civilization. Har-appa means "Horus is Father" in the Dravidian language.

The origin of Dravidian religion was the Nile and ancient Kush. The Indian historian and anthropologist Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan has written: "We have to begin with the Negroid or Negrito people of prehistoric India who were the first human inhabitants. Originally they would appear to have come from Africa through Arabia and the coastlands of Iran and Baluchistan."

According to the Matsya, an ancient book from India, the world belonged to the Kushites (Saka) for 7000 years.

Vedic references to Kusha, Rama, Hori, Krishna and the Ancient One are all found in older Hebrew and Aramaic texts. Indeed, a study of Hindu religious motifs demonstrates that all were found among the Nilotics peoples, many of whom dispersed across Arabia, the Indian Sub-continent and into Indonesia and Japan. The Nile-Japan Ainu connection has been well demonstrated. There is also a connection between the Kushites and the Kushan (Kuşāņa) of Bactria and China.

For more on the expansion out of Africa see The Afro-Asiatic Dominion.


Jews

Most rabbis have ignored the research, secure in their often esoteric interpretations of the Bible. Rabbinic myth weaving has penetrated many commentaries on Genesis, especially commentaries written from an Evangelical perspective. Evangelicals, especially the American brand, tend to think that everything written by Jews has special authority. Yet these myths distort what Genesis and the Bible present about Abraham and his people. All of the Bible is about the fulfillment of God's promise to send the Divine Seed into the world to conquer death. This is what Abraham's ancestors expected and Jesus is the fulfillment of that ancient (pre-Israel) expectation.

Messianic passages of the Bible have parallels in the more ancient Horite texts. Consider how Horus, the archetype of Christ, describes himself in the Coffin texts (passage 148):

“I am Horus, the great Falcon upon the ramparts of the house of him of the hidden name. My flight has reached the horizon. I have passed by the gods of Nut. I have gone further than the gods of old. Even the most ancient bird could not equal my very first flight. I have removed my place beyond the powers of Set, the foe of my father Osiris. No other god could do what I have done. I have brought the ways of eternity to the twilight of the morning. I am unique in my flight. My wrath will be turned against the enemy of my father Osiris and I will put him beneath my feet in my name of ‘Red Cloak’.” (Myth and Symbol in Ancient Egypt by R.T. Rundle Clark, p. 216)

Note the similarity to Psalm 110:1, a messianic reference: The Lord says to my Lord: “Sit at My right hand until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet.”

Shaye Cohen, Professor at Harvard, is the author of The Beginnings of Jewishness in which he portrays of Abraham as the first Jew. Reading Cohen, it becomes evident that he does not personally believe this myth. During a November 2008 NOVA interview, Cohen admits that this view of Abraham as a Jew is of a “mythic kind.” He states, "So in a mythic kind of way we can say that Abraham recognizes God and that Abraham launches the process—biological and social and cultural—that will culminate in the people of Israel, who in turn will become Jews and the purveyors of Judaism.”

Cohen gets one thing right: Abraham recognized God. The rest is nonsense! Abraham's nine sons are the progenitors of many peoples, some of whom are identified today as Egyptians, Ethiopians, Jews and Arabs. Cohen is attempting to sell the myth of Jewish purity. However, the only lines which maintained blood purity through exclusive intermarried were the Horite priestly lines and there are Coptic, Jewish and Arab descendants of those lines.

Cohen notes that "the rabbis of old imagined that Abraham observed the whole Torah, that Abraham observed all the commandments: He observed the Sabbath, he observed the festivals, he observed the laws of culture and food. He observed everything, not just circumcision, which is attributed to him explicitly in Genesis, but everything else as well. Because how can you imagine our forefather Abraham, the founder of Judaism, not observing the Jewish rules, not observing the Jewish laws? This is a wonderful anachronism, a charming conceit. But historically speaking, how could it be?"

Dr. Cohen recognizes that the myth of Abraham as a Jew is not historically accurate, but he refuses to accept that Abraham and his caste were Horites. This would mean recognizing that they worshiped Horus and expected the myth of Horus to be fulfilled as promised in Genesis 3:15. There's the rub!  Jews always start their history after Genesis 3:15. Cohen says, “The biblical narrative gets going with Abraham in Genesis chapter 12. Abraham in turn Isaac, in turn Jacob, in turn Joseph and the twelve tribes, this brings us directly to the people of Israel and the covenant at Sinai. So Abraham is thought of as the first Jew, the archetype.”

While Genesis does trace a line from Abraham to Isaac and to Jacob (Yacob), it also traces the Horite lines of Seir and Esau, the lines of Ishmael the Egyptian, and the lines of Joktan the Arabian. Given that these ruler-priest lines intermarried exclusively, it is evident that some Jews, Arabs and Egyptians share common Horite blood. This becomes apparent when one digs deeper into the genealogical information.

The Genesis genealogical data makes it possible to trace Abraham’s ancestors as well as his descendants. This is the genealogical information that Dr. Cohen seeks to avoid by beginning the biblical narrative at Chapter 12.

It is impossible to speak of only one direct line from Abraham to the Israelites because Abraham’s descendants by his nine sons intermarried. The genealogical data strongly suggests that Abraham's first-born son was Joktan, the forefather of the Joktanite tribes of Arabia. This being the case, Abraham could as easily be described the “first Arab” or the “archetype” of the Arab, since Arabs are descended from him through his sons Joktan (Yaqtan) and Ishmael (Yismael).

Myth makers come in all stripes, including by angry bigots such as Herbert Schweigers and vicious killers such as Anders Breiviks. These days the Bible is used to promote all sorts of agendas. One of the benefits of Biblical Anthropology is that it exposes such lies.


Here are the reactions of people who have followed the research:

"I read the material she has gratuitously given me in response to my questions. I read it and make my own assessment. I am not an anthropologist, but I do have a pretty good BS detector. Her material and artifacts and explanations make sense to me and are both fascinating and enlightening. Could she be in error? Sure. Is she knowledgeable? Definitely. The main thing I noticed about @Alice_Linsley is that when I give her new data, new genomic studies, she is able to mesh it up with her previous work. If it matches up she will tell you, if it contradicts, she will also tell you. She does follow the data where it goes, so she is doing real science. Does her Christian beliefs help or hinder her scientific work? I say it helps, as her faith inspires her. Because she will honestly report and mesh the new findings and these new findings or changes to her understanding through science have NO IMPACT on her faith."-- Patrick Trischitta

Alice's analysis of the kinship pattern of the biblical Hebrew "opened my eyes to understand not just Genesis and not just the Pentateuch, but the whole diacronic layers in all of the Old Testament." --Shalom Rutgaizer, Israeli archaeologist (Tel Aviv University)

Just Genesis is "an interesting blog dedicated to anthropological sleuthing of pre-Abrahamic origins."-- Madison Gentsch

"Alice C. Linsley is an original and originals are few."-- Dr. Catherine Acholonu

"If only Christian discourse in this country were filled with such enlightened, such profound insights into the origins of human thought and life! You do us all a great service in writing things like this."-- Arturo Vasquez

"She has an excellent blog. I am amazed at the sources she analyzes and presents in her blog." -- Dr. Clyde Winters

"Alice, thank you so much for your research and blog. I am in my senior year at an evangelical university and taking a course in Genesis, but cannot reconcile with what's being taught. Your work has encouraged my faith in a way that words fail right now." -- Adam

"Alice, you are doing awesome work." -- Father Rick Lobs

"You are an excellent researcher. Your insights have the effect of exploding fluorescence. You have made me feel like the eons gone past are just within our reach; we don't need to look very far."--John Ogutu (Luo consultant)

"Alice, I am thoroughly taken with your blog - - what a wonderful gift! Keep up the great work." --Dr. William G. Brown, Vice President and Academic Dean, Midway College

In terms of tertiary studies, I learned Old Testament from 'extreme liberals' as well as 'moderate conservatives.' Then for years I felt satisfied that, although by no means a specialist, I had worked out a sensible approach to the Old Testament that was authentically Christian while avoiding the pitfalls of fundamentalism, marcionism and liberalism . . . especially with regard to the Book of Genesis.

That was until I found Alice Linsley's work.

One of my favourite blogs is JUST GENESIS which combines her biblical, historical, theological, cultural, historical, anthropological and archeological research, and takes the reader into fascinating areas which really do make sense (and have caused me to change quite a number of my previously held views!).
 -- Bishop David Chislett SSC (Read more here.)

"Alice, you are an amazing scholar! I have been searching for toponymic evidence for Enoch in Africa for a long time. You are a brave pioneer. Your blog is a box of jewels. I wish I could examine each gem more closely."-- Susan Burns, Biblical Anthropologist

"I have been immersed, (baptized) in your remarkable scholarship and compelling style. Thank you for sharing your gift and what can only be described as a passion." -- Father David W. Cardona

"The significance of my research is that I have identified the marriage and ascendancy pattern of Abraham's Horite caste and have demonstrated that this marriage structure drove Kushite expansion and the diffusion of the proto-Gospel. Using the tools of kinship analysis, I have traced the Horite ancestry of Jesus Christ from his earliest named ancestors in Genesis 4 and 5." --Alice C. Linsley


Friday, July 15, 2011

Thoughts on Blogging

Alice C. Linsley


I maintain 5 blogs and have 5 years experience as a blogger. That doesn’t make me an expert, but I have learned a few things that might be helpful to other bloggers.

I haven’t handled all readers with patience or sensitivity, so if I have offended you, please forgive me. Forgiveness such as that expressed in the comments here would make the blogging world a much better place!

That goes for moderation of comments. It is best to be generous and let prickly or aggressive comments stand, even when they are disdainful in tone. Usually other readers will challenge the comment and sometimes a good discussion ensues.

A comment shouldn’t be deleted simply because it represents a view with which you don’t agree. That isn’t moderation; that’s censorship. It is still censorship when done under the guise of "off topic." Rarely is a comment so far off topic as to necessitate deletion.

When it comes to moderation, STUDENTS PUBLISH HERE! must be watched vigilantly for inappropriate comments and links. I’ve discovered that the word “students” attracts predators, school recruiters, and a large amount of spam geared to young people. Because the virtual world isn’t safe, I never publish identifying information with the student’s poem or short story.

Ethics Forum was created to help my college Ethics, Philosophy and World Religions students. This is a resource to which they turn when preparing their final papers. Here readers will find the latest news from around the world related to ethics, religion, and the impact of philosophy on contemporary thought. Interestingly, the topics that have attracted the most comments deal with male/female circumcision and an article that I wrote for my Ethics classes titled “What Makes a Good Society?” Ethics Forum has a small number of regular readers, but of all my blogs it has the widest international readership.

The blog with the highest volume of visits is Just Genesis. Here the comments are generally thoughtful and relevant. Given the academic nature of the research and the narrow focus of the blog, most readers are people who sincerely want to know more about the first book of the Bible. Rarely do I have to delete a comment.

My rule is to delete comments that attack someone personally. Words like pompous, disturbed and boring signal the need for scrutiny. This is when I track the comment using Feedjit and I make a note of the origin of the comment for future reference. It is helpful to keep in mind that these words usually project on someone else the very traits that describe the person making the comment.

Sometimes a reader will email me rather than post a comment. This is a good way to express criticism or concern because it allows us to converse more candidly offline. Often these conversations stimulate my thinking and I will write about them at the blog.  I have some good internet friends whose acquaintance I first made by this means.

Biblical Anthropology is my newest blog. Here I publish research in my field of interest that doesn't relate directly to Genesis or Ethics.  These are occasional papers and of interest mainly to anthropologists.

There is an INDEX of topics with links at Just Genesis, Ethics Forum, Students Publish Here!, and Biblical Anthropology to facilitate web searches and I try to keep these up-to-date.  If I fall behind in this task it is because I actually do have a life outside of blogging! : )

Blogs can provide a valuable means of communication, inspiration, learning, debate, and encouragement. They also can be used to disseminate evil ideas and images, to inflict pain and to belittle. The blog owner is responsible for what happens and most of us take this responsibility seriously.

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Where to Begin Processing Material at Just Genesis


Alice C. Linsley

Over the past 30+ years I have made some significant discoveries using the data of Genesis to recover information about Abraham and his Nilo-Saharan ancestors. The key research involves identifying that these people were a royal priest caste that practiced endogamy. I have identified their marriage and ascendancy pattern using the Genesis King Lists.

This week several people contacted me about how to approach the material at JUST GENESIS.  The amount of information can be fairly overwhelming for first-time readers.  Here are two responses, in case others are wondering.


Erik,

Thanks for your interest in the Bible and in Genesis in particular. Genesis is the foundation to the whole of the Bible so if we get it wrong we will misinterpret and misrepresent the rest.

It is in Genesis that we find the origins of Messianic expectation and God's first promise: That "the Woman" would bring forth "the Seed" who would crush the serpent's head and restore us to Paradise/communion with God. The Bible closes with the Seed making this final promise: "Don't be afraid. I am with you always, even to the end of the age."

The drama begins with a promise made to Abraham's ancestors in Eden (a vast well-watered area that stretched from the Nile region of East Africa to the Tigris-Euphrates) and continues with the levitical laws that point to the binary distinctions that keep us oriented to God, and then the prophets who challenge the practices that lead the people away from God, and then the miraculous events involving 2 women of the Horite ruler-priest lines: Elizabeth and the Virgin Mary. People of their day wondered about them! The priest Simeon and the Prophetess Anna confirmed what John the Baptist also recognized - that Jesus, the son of Mary was the fulfillment of Genes 3:15 - the Seed had appeared! And his identity as the Son of God was confirmed by His resurrection from the dead (as Sts Paul, Peter and John tell us.)

So, you see that the entire Biblical drama is really about on thing: God's fulfillment of the promise of Eden in the person of His beloved Son, Jesus Christ. It remains to us who believe to tell others about God's great goodness, eternal power and divine nature, and to trust the Holy Spirit to lead us to repentance and humility.

With this overview in mind, you might begin by reading about Eden, the Edenic Promise, and Why Jesus Visited Tyre. This also: The Kingdom of God in Genesis. Read the related readings posted at the end of the articles to gain a fuller picture.

It is difficult to summarize over 32 years of research, but this should get you started. If I can be of further assistance, let me know.

Best wishes,
Alice C. Linsley


Father,

Thank you for your interest in biblical genealogy. I wish there were a book(s) that I could recommend that would help you to study the kinship pattern through the Bible. As far as I know there isn't one. (I'm writing 2, but neither is finished yet.)

I've been pioneering this field for 32+ years so I'm probably your best source for now. Look in the INDEX on the home page to see if there are articles that might answer your questions. I do trace the kinship pattern to the New Testament, showing that Mary and Joseph, of the ruler-priest lines descending from Cain (Gen. 4) and Seth (Gen. 5), were patrilineal cousins.

The kinship pattern of Abraham and his people is identical to the pattern of Moses and his people (because they are all of the Horite ruler caste). I've show that here: http://jandyongenesis.blogspot.com/2009/04/moses-two-wives.html

The pattern is evident in the naming of firstborn sons in Numbers also. For example: Reuben's firstborn son was Hanoch, which is another version of Enoch/Nok. It is evident also in I Samuel were we read about the ruler-priest Elkanah with his 2 wives, Penninah and Hannah.

It may be that you are more interested in the research that is published at my other blog: Biblical Anthropology, but I'm not sure. There is an INDEX there also.

I hope that this is helpful. Perhaps enough to get you started. If I can be of further help, let me know.

May God bless you and your service in the Church.

Best wishes,
Alice C. Linsley


Related reading:  Reactions to My Genesis Research; Alice C. Linsley's Research on Genesis; INDEX of Topics at Just Genesis